Vol. VI , No. 4.] Numismatic Supplement. 241 



[N.8.] 



Reverse. 



M 



l-x 



Tliia is a small thick coin (size -75") with lettering much 

 cruder than on the coins of this mint of Shah ■ Alam II usually 

 met with. This fact probably indicates the loss of influence of 

 the suzerain po\^er. Mr. W. S. Talbot, C.S., has a similar coin 

 dated 1198. A coin of Deogadh in my cabinet of the normal 

 fabric is dated 1190-17. 



2. Shah 'Alam II. 



Mint — Balanagar Gadha. 

 A.H. — Absent. 

 Regnal year — 36. 



A coin of this type has been published by Colonel Vost in 

 Numismatic Supplement XI, p. 326. This coin has as mint 

 marks a trisul and 12-pointed star on the obverse in the second 

 line, and a star to the right of the regnal year on the reverse. 



3. Shah 'Alam II. 

 Mint — Nagpur ? 

 A.H.— 1227. 

 Regnal year — 35. 

 Size— -85*. 



Obverse. 



• • « -~ "^ — 





Over " badshah " are a trisul and a flower with 11 petals 



and a stalk. 



Reverse. 



u**** ro 



&X~i 



