Vol. VI, No. 11.] Numismatic Supplement. 669 



[N 



Obverse. 



Reverse. 



As on No. 41 ; 

 date 1162. 



u* 



yi 



/0 



J^C 



No. 43. ,fl. 



• 



ifmf, Derajat. 

 Date, 1161 A.H. ; 1 R 



Obverse. 

 As on No. 41 ; 

 date 1161. 



Reverse 



LF 



■♦** 



LF. 



,yt^. aJuc 



* 



rfJ 



o^y*> 



The above are three coins of Ahmad Shah struck at 

 Bhakhar, Dera, and Derajat mints respectively. No. 41 was 

 published in my Bahawalpur paper as being a coin of Muham- 

 mad Shah of Bhakhar mint, but I now find that the name ia 

 unmistakably Ahmad Shah, and Bhakhar coins of Muhammad 

 still remain to be found. The remarkable thing about these 

 three coins is the absence of the usual title Bahadur after 

 Ahmad Shah. 



Coin No. 45 is a Dera rupee of Ahmad Shah Bahadur, 

 dated 1162 A. H. ; 2 R, and coin No. 46 is a rupee of the same 

 emperor struck at Derajat in 1161 A. H. ; 1 R. Their dates 

 are the same as those of Nos. 42 and 43, respectively, and it is 

 strange that rupees were struck in the same places in the same 

 years, some of Ahmad Shah, and some of Ahmad Shah Baha- 

 dur. Can the above three coins be issues of Ahmad Shah 

 Durrani ? They are of poor workmanship, but are Mughal, 



and not Durrani in type and style. 



Three other Dera rupees of this 

 2 R, — AH., 3 R, and— A.H., 5 R. 



Another coin, the present attri 

 me doubtful, is the following rupee. 



No. 44. JR. 



Mint, Kashmir. 

 Date, 1166 A.H. ; 6 R. 



to 



