466 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. [N.S., XVIII, 
of the Imperial University of Kasan, (in Russian), Kasan, 
1834. Quoted by Laufer in his sketch of Mongolian Literature, 
p. 166. (This is not the same as No. 21, and the list does not 
seem to be mentioned anywhere else.) 
23. Wassiliew. Notice sur les ouvrages en languages de 
Asie orientale que se trouvent dans la Bibliothéque de I’Uni- 
versité de Saint-Pétersbourg, 1856. (From Geuther’s Ephée- 
mérides, 65, March, 1923.) It is not evident, however. whether 
this list contains any Tibetan titles. 
Scrutinising the above lists, we find that the bulk of im- 
portant information and material is contained in Nos. 3, 4, 5. 
10, 14 and 16. Nos. 6, 15, 19 and 20 are little accessible, and 
Nos. 6, 9,15 and 21 may contain some important titles. The 
old St. Petersburg lists and No. 14 are most satisfactory to 
deal with, as they give the titles in full, in correct transcrip- 
tion. Waddell’s list is curiously inequal, giving full details for 
some titles and only summarised translations for others. 
Wangdan’s titles are written with oriental freedom. Walsh 
has, unfortunately, given no attention whatever to the relation 
of his works to Sanskrit literature. The descriptions in No. 17 
are insufficient and the list only serves as an indication of the 
existence of the works it mentions. My own titles are insuf- 
ficient for strict bibliographical purposes. Whether the time 
has arrived to amalgamate all these titles into a small Cata- 
logus Catalogorum may be doubted. 
Nevertheless the totality of the data furnished by our lists 
brings ample material and is sufficient to indicate the richness 
of Tibetan extra-canonical literature, opening vistas in many 
_ Rev. Father Felix, 0.C. Remarks on the Tibetan 
Manuscript Vocabularies in Bishop’s College, Calcutta. 
-A.8.B., New Series, Vol. VIIT, 1912, pp. 379-397. 


