332 MR. -w. WARRBN ON LEPiDOPTERA [June 5, 



the fasciae formed by lines less marked and not darkened ; denti- 

 culations blunter, the second fascia curved, not sinuated ; the 

 apical dash pale ferruginous. The present examples seem to answer 

 his description, but it is doubtful if they are a distinct species. 



PYRALIDINA. 

 Family Pyralidid.e. 



169. Pyralis bractiatella. (No. 65.) 



Myelois bractiatella, Wlk. Cat. Lep. Het. B. M, xxvii. p. 3& ; 

 Moore, Ceylon, iii. p. 262, pi. 1/8. fig. 5, ? . 



Two females and one male from Campbellpore, May and June 

 1886, July 1885. 



170. Pyralis platymitris. (No. 65.) 

 Pyralis platymitris, Butler, P. Z. S. 1882, p. 166. 

 One male, taken August 9 at Kala Pani. 

 Darjiling and Solun are other localities. 



The species very much resembles P. elachia, Butler, 111. Lep. 

 Het. iii. p. 70, pi. 58. fig. 3. 



1/1. Pyralis xylinalis. 



Pyralis xylinalis, Swinhoe, P. Z. S. 18S5. p. 865, pi. 57. fig. I/. 

 A single female from Campbellpore, somewhat worn, but recog- 

 nizable, July 20, 1886. 



172. Surattha albipennis. (No. 23.) 



Surattha albipennis, Butler, P. Z. S. 1886, p. 383. 



Two males and two females from Campbellpore, dated July 1886. 



1/3. ACTENIA GNIDUSALTS. (No. 88.) 



Aglossa gnidusalis, Wlk. Cat. Lep. Het. B. M. xvii. p. 278. 



? Scotomera tristis, Butler, P. Z. S. 1881, p. 623. 



1 Cledeobia infumatalis, ErschofF, Fedtschenko Reise, Lep. p. 73, 

 pi. T. fig. 79, $ . 



One male, Campbellpore, July 25, 1886, in perfect condition. 



"Walker's description, made from insects in the collection of Mr. E. 

 L. Layard, is very exact ; but he omits to notice that the head and 

 face are pale ochreous. 



Three other species which Walker assigns with a ? to the genus 

 Aglossa— harpialis, xvii. p. 276, rufifluulis, xxxiv. p. 1249, basalis, 

 xxxiv. p. \2bO,&\idiA.laminalis, Gn. Delt. &Pyr. 129. 27, — ahke from 

 the structure of the palpi and antennae, and from the character of 

 the markings, appear to belong rather to this genus. 



The two specimens from which Mr. Butler described Scotomera 

 tristis, 1. c, are both considerably worn and without fringes ; besides 

 which, being both females, the fore veings are naturally narrower 

 than those of the male ; the whiteness of the face and of the under 

 surface, which he notices in describing them, are of course to be 



