1892.] FROGS IN THE INDIAN MUSEUM. 347 



14. IxALUs ciNERAscENs, Stoliczka, Proc. As. Soc. Beng. 1870, 

 p. 275. 



This species has been referred by Bouleuger (Ind. K,ept. p. 510) 

 to Leptobrachium monticola ; but an examination of the type shows 

 that it is a true Lvalus, and that it is most nearly alUed to Ixulus 

 liypomelas, Giinth., from which it differs in its shorter snout and its 

 shorter legs, the tibio-tarsal articulation only reaching as far as the 

 eye ; the legs also are cross-banded. 



15. IxALus GLANDULOSus (Jerdon) ; Boulenger, Ind. Kept. 

 p. 488. 



Ixalus punctatus (Anderson, Journ. As. Soc. Beng. xl. 1871, 

 p. 27), identified with doubt by Boulenger with Ixalus leiicorhinus, 

 is really, as shown by comparison of the type in the Indian Museum, 

 identical with Ixalus glandulosus. 



16. Ixalus asper, Boulenger, P. Z. S. 1886, p. 415. 



The Indian Museum possesses an example of this species procured 

 by one of the Museum Collectors in the Burma-Siam hills. It had 

 previously been got only by Mr. Wray in Perak, so that it is an 

 addition to the Indian fauna. The Indian Museum specimen agrees 

 in every way with the type, with which it has been compared. 



17. MiCROHYLA achatina (Boic) J Boulenger, Cat. Batr. Sal. 

 p. 166. 



The Indian Museum possesses an example of this little Frog from 

 Ahsoon in Tenasserim. As this species has been hitherto recorded 

 only from Java and the Moluccas, it is an addition to the fauna of 

 British India. 



18. BuFO STOMATicus, Liitken ; Boulenger, Ann. Mag. N. H. 

 (6) vii. 1891, p. 463. 



The Indian Museum possesses examples of this Toad from Calcutta 

 and Burma, which agree very well with the type in the British 

 Museum. This species is probably not uncommon in Lower Bengal, 

 but has hitherto been confounded with Bufo andersonii. 



19. Bufo parietalis, Boulenger, Cat. Batr. Sal. p. 312. 



A Frog in the Indian Museum from Hongkong, received from the 

 Hongkong Museum in exchange, seems referable to this species, 

 which has hitherto been got only in Malabar. It is just possible 

 that a mistake has been made in the labelling ; but if this is not the 

 case, the distributional area of this species is considerably extended. 



20. Leptobrachium carinense, Boulenger, Ann. Mus. Geneva, 

 (2) vii. 1889, p. 748; id. Rept. Ind. p. 511. 



An example of this species, procured very many years ago by 

 Major Berdmore in Burma, and named Megalophrys montana by 

 Blyth, is very interesting, in that it possesses vomerine teeth in 

 two very nearly parallel lines between the choanse, and separated 



