1892.] THE NAGA AND KAREN HILLS AND PERAK. 625 



Nacaduba MACROPHTHALMA. 



Lyccena macrophthalma, Felder, Verb. zool,-bot. Ges. Wien, 

 vol. xii. p. 483 (1862). 



Nacaduba macrophtlialma. Butt. Ind. iii. p. 143. 

 Takeu in the Naga and Karen Hills, 



Nacaduba kerriana. 



Nacaduba kerriana, Distant, Ann. N. H. (5) vol. xvii, p. 253 

 (1886) ; id. Rhop. Mai. p. 455, t. xlii. fig. 12 6; Butt. Ind. iii. 

 p. 146. 



A pair of this species from Perak : the female differs from the 

 male exactly as do the females oi N. macrophthalma and N. atrata, 

 which last it closely resembles, from their respective males. I also 

 have two specimens from the Karen Hills, which have the centre of 

 both wings above pale bluish white, and the underside pale with the 

 markings very indistinct, except the black marginal spots and anal 

 ocellus ; these agree exactly with N. kerriana and appear to me to be 

 probably a dry-season form of it. 



Nacaduba viola ^ 



Lampides viola, Moore, Ann. N. H. (4) vol. xx. p. 340 (1877). 



Nacaduba viola, Butt. Ind. iii. p. 146. 



Four males and two females from the Naga Hills. ' ^ 



Nacaduba atrata. 



Lyccena atrata, Horsf. Cat. Lep. E. I. Co. p. 78 (1828). 



Nacaduba atrata, Butt. Ind. iii. p. 148. 



Sent from all the localities visited by Doherty except Bernardmyo. 



Nacaduba c(Elestis. 



Nacaduba ccelestis, de Nicev. J. A. S. B. vol. Iv. pt. ii. p. 366, t. xvii. 

 fig. 11 S (1886); Butt. Ind. iii. p. 151, t. xxvii. fig. 184 c? • 



A few males from Margharita and the Naga Hills and one from 

 Momeit ; the female remains unknown to me. 



Nacaduba ardates. 



Lyccena ardates, Moore, P. Z. S. 1874, p. 574, t. Ixvii. fig. 1. 



Nacaduba ardates. Butt. Ind. iii. p. 153, t. xxvii. fig. 185 c? 

 (tailless form). 



Both forms were taken in the Karen Hills, but only the tailed 

 form was sent from the Nagas. 



Nacaduba bhutea. 



Nacaduba bhutea, de Nicev. J. A. S. B. vol. Iii. pt. ii. p. 72, 1. 1. 

 fig. 13 c? (1883); Butt. Ind. iii. p. 152. 



Males only from the Naga Hills, agreeing exactly with those from 

 Sikkim. Although the female remains unknown to me, I have no 

 doubt it is a perfectly distinct species. 



1 Mr. de Niceville informs me that this is the same as N. hemes, Feld., of 

 which he has seen thetype. 



