FROM THE’ INDIAN REGION, 505 
On the other hand, it seems unnatural for me to refer it to 
another species than that represented by the male; and as this 
is very well characterized, I have found it most correct to grant 
the species the afore-named limitation. 
GAGRELLA BISPINOSA, Karsch. 
Karsch, (13) 1892, p. 309. 
G. monacanTua (Herbst). 
Herbst, (1) 1798, p. 19. 
I think it impossible to identify this species from the 
description. 
Scotomenta, Thor., 1889. 
ScOTOMENIA CETRATA, Thor. 
Thorell, (10) 1889, p. 665. 
With regard to the other genera described from India, I refer 
to the following papers :— 
Thorell, 10. 
Simon, 8. 
C. L. Koch, 2. 
On full consideration it seems natural for me to refer the 
genera Syleus, Thor., Systenocentrus, Sim., and Oncobunus, Thor., 
to the same genus. 
Besides the species herein described, I have had some young 
specimens which it has been impossible to define. Two large 
specimens from Punkabari were very well marked. They had 
relations both with Gagrella and Liobunum (the marginal pro- 
jections, for instance, were wanting); but it was impossible to 
decide whether they were full-grown or not. As their genus 
was thus dubious, I have not described them. 
SUPPLEMENT. 
GAGRELLA SEPIA, Loman. 
J. C. C. Loman, (14) 1894, p. 8. 
2. Spine with only few granules at the base. A triangle in 
front, including the frontal eminence, is smooth, but beset with 
a row of three large granules along the frontal margin. Front 
and back of the high tubercle perpendicular. The top is convex, 
