330 ' Mr. A. G. Butler on the 



Gerba, Walker. 



25. Gerba quadrifasciata, Wlk. Lep. Het. Suppl. 1, 



p. 270. Ilah. — Oaxaca. 

 Scarcely generically distinct from Ruscino. 



EusciNO, Walker. 



26. Ruscino arctlfascia, n. sp. 



Ruscino menea, Wlk. (nee Drury), Lep. Het. 2, 

 p. 564. Hab. — Honduras. 



27. Ruscino latifasciatus, Butler, Ann. & Mag. S. 4, 



vol. XV. p. 341. Hah. — Veragua. 



28. Ruscino iastifera, "VYlk. Lep. Het. Suppl. \, p. 264. 



Hah. — Mexico. 

 This species differs from tlie preceding in the greyer 

 tint of the primaries, the more regular transverse band, 

 and the somewhat narrower black border of the second- 

 aries. 



29. Ruscino lunaris = Cisthene lunaris, Wlk. Lep. Het. 



Suppl. 1, p. 24L Hab. — Bogota and Yucatan. 



29*. Ruscino menea, Drury, 111. Nat. Hist. 3, pi. iii. fig. 2. 

 Hab. — Brazil (^Drury). 

 The five preceding forms are all local modifications of 

 one type, chiefly differing in the width of the yellow bands 

 of primaries and of the black border of secondaries. 



30. Ruscino basalis = Nelo basalis, Wlk. Lep. Het. 



Suppl. 1, p. 184. Hah. — Bogota. 

 Chiefly differs from the preceding species in its smaller 

 size, and the absence of the submarginal band of primaries. 

 There are, however, other less striking distinctions. 



EuDESMiA, Huhner. 



31. Eudesmia ruficollis, Hiibn. Sml. Exot. Schm. 2, 



figs. 1 — 4. Hab. — Brazil. 

 This species differs but little from the genus Ruscino in 

 structure. L. mina of Guerin appears to be congeneric. 



Brycea, Walker. 



32. Br^^cea disjuncta, Wlk. Lep. Het. 2, p. 563. Hab. 



— Brazil. 



