354 Mr. A. G. Butler on the 



Chinese specimens which appear to be faded. The speciers 

 ought, perhaps, to be placed next to L. p-iseola, which it 

 nearly resembles. 



199. Lithosia aspersa, Wlk. Journ. Linn. Soc. vi. p. 104. 



Mab. — Sarawak. 



200. 2 Lithosia rotundipennis, Wlk. Journ. Linn. Soc. 



vi. p. 104. 

 $ Lithosia nodicorhis, Wlk. 1. c. 

 Lithosia chilomorpha, Snellen, Tijd. voor Ent. 

 1877, pi. V. fig. 1. Hah. — Sarawak. 

 This, the preceding and the succeeding species, differ 

 somewhat from the other species of this genus in the form 

 of the primaries, but L. reticulata and L. angulifera seem 

 to form a transition between them and L. muscerda. 



201. Lithosia sambara, Moore, Cat. Lep. E. I. C. ii. 



p. 304. Mab.— Java. 



202. Lithosia reticulata, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1865, 



p. 798. Hab. — Darjeeling. 



203. Lithosia muscerda, Hiibner, Bomb. 127, pi. xxiv. 



fig. 103. i7a6.— Europe. 



204. Lithosia prabana, Moore, Cat. Lep. E. I. C. ii. 



p. 304. Hab. — Java. 

 I believe Walker's L. nigricans from Borneo to be this 

 species, but his description is too bad for positive identifi- 

 cation. 



205. Lithosia natara, Moore, Cat. Lep. E. I. C. ii. p. 304. 



L[ab. — Java. 



This and the preceding species would perhaps be better 

 placed near X. antica. 



Lithosia colon of Moeschler appears to resemble L. bi- 

 pMwc^a of Hambur. 



CoRCURA, Walker. 



206. Corcura torta, Wlk. Journ. Linn. Soc. vi. p. 111. 



Hab. — Sarawak. 

 Diastrophia daaypyga of Felder appears to be an allied 

 species. 



