TRICHOCEREUS. 



137 



11. Trichocereus chiloensis (Colla). 



Cactus chiloensis Colla, Mem. Accad. Sci. Torino 31: .142. 1826. 



Cereus chiloensis De Candolle, Prodr. 3:465. 1828. 



Cereus chiiensis Pfeiffer, Enum. Cact. 86. 1837. 



Cereus panoplaeatus Monville, Hort. Univ. 1: 220. 1840. 



Cereus heleromorphus Monville, Hort. Univ. 1:221. 1840. 



Cereus longispinus Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354. 1845. 



Cereus pepinianus Lemaire in Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354. 184.5 



Cereus subuliferus Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354- 1845. 



Cereus gilvus Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 355. 1845. 



Cereus ouisco Remy in Gay, Fl. Chilena 3: 19. 1847. 



Cereus linnaei Forster, Hamb. Gartenz. 17: 165. 1861. 



Cereus funkii Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 61. 1897. 



Cereus chiiensis pyenacanthus Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chiiensis zhkaanus Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chiiensis panhoplites .Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1S97. 



Cereus chiiensis poselgeri Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chiiensis heleromorphus Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chiiensis polygonus Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63, 1897. 







% V a I 



, , , n v. 



Fig. 198. — Trichocereus chiloensis. 



Fig. 199. — Trichocereus chiloensis. 



* Cereus pepinianus was described by Salm-Dvck in 1845 (Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354- 1845) who there credits the 

 name to Lemaire. Lemaire evidently had reported the name under some other genus, for in 1850 (Salm-Dyck, Cact. 

 Hort Dyck 1849.44 197) Salm-Dvck redescribed the species, crediting himself with the name and citing " Echmocactus 

 pepinianus Cat. Cels" as synonym. The name Echinocactus pepinianus Lemaire occurs first in 1846 (Forster, Handb. 

 Cact 347) but without description. Labouret in 1853 takes it up as Echinocactus echnwides pepinianus (Monogr. 

 Cact 178)' with the statement that Salm-Dyck considered it synonymous with Cereus pyenacanthus. These two 

 combinations in Echmocactus, while evidently referring to Cereus pepinianus, being without description, can not be 

 properly referred here as synonyms. They are, however, both referred by Schumann to Echinocactus pepinianus. 

 The plant which he describes, however, is different from Cereus pepinianus. If a good Echinocactus, it should be 

 credited to Schumann, with the citation to his monograph (Gesamtb. Kakteen 420. 1898). 



