Fig. :■', sliow.s No. 2 skull and the Piltdown skull (in dotted outline; both 

 drawn to the same scale and viewed from above. Note that the post-orbital 

 constriction and the ma.ximum parietal breadth both compare unfavom-ably 

 with those of the Piltdown specimen. 



Fis- 4 show-s ^o. 1 skull (m continuous outline), the Java calvaria, the 

 .Neanderthal calvaria and a modern Canadian skull all drawn to the same 

 scale for purposes of comparison from tie evolutionarv standpoint Note 

 the deficiency of tie frontal cranial arc of No. 1 skull arid the bulping of the 

 panetoHjccipital arc. Note also the "fallen in" aprearance of the frontal 

 cranial arc m the lower forms and its obliteration in" the Canadian cranium 



