Volume 8 



February 29, 1912 



MUHLENBERGIA 



STUDIES IX THE GENUS ERYTHROCOMA Greene— I. 



Bv C. P. Smith 



Bibliography 



(1) Pursli, F. Fl. Anier. Sept. 1: 352. 1.S14. 



(2) Niittall, T., Gen. N. A. PI. 1: 309-310. 1818. 



(3) Torrey, J., and Gray, A., Fl. N. Am. 1: 425. 1840. 



(4) Torrey, J., Fl. N. Y. 1: 203-204. 1843. 



(5) Gray, A., Man. ed. 2, 117. 1856. 



(6) Cooper, J. G., Pac. R. R. Rep. 2: part 12, 59. i860. 



(7) Provancher, Abbe, Flore Canadienne 1; 194. 1862. 



(8) Brewer, W. H., and Watson, S., Bot. Cal. 1: 176. 1876. 



(9) Watson, S., Bib. Index N. A. Bot. 285. 1878. 



(10) Britton, N. L.,and Brown, A., 111. Fl. N. Am. 2: 219. 



1897. 



(11) Greene, E. L., Pittonia 4: 48. 1899. 



(12) Greene, E. L., Leaflets 1: 178. 1906. 



(13) Piper, C. V., Cont. U. S. Nat. Herb. 11: 344. 1906. 



(14) Rydberg, P. A., Fl. Colo. 179, 188. 1906. 



(15) Robinson, B. L., and Fernald, M. L., Gray Man. ed. 7, 



486. 1908. 



(16) Coulter, J. M., and Nelson, A., New Man. Rockv Mt. 



Bot. 262. 1909. 



Introduction. — In June, 1909, I collected a plant of striking 

 characters, new to me, on the hillsides above Cache Junction, 

 Utah. The plant was in full fruit, and the prominent, plumose, 

 persistent styles led me readily to determine it as Geuvi cilialicm 

 Pursh, as treated in the meager literature then at hand. The 

 flowers present seemed withered and belated, so caused me no 

 concern, and no critical study of the material seemed necessary. 



On May i, 191 1, while making a trip over the same hills, 

 the plant was again secured, at this date being mostly in bud, 

 but with sufficient material in full flower to make a satisfactory 



ii; 



