125 



For E. uncinata turn to Tlate 02, Part XI^'. E. Balrri lias narrower leaves 

 (a.s a A'ery general rule), and narrower juvenile leaves; the anthers are different, though 

 not widely so. The buds of the two species suflieiently resenilile each other to 

 necessitate caution, })ut the fruits are different. 



2. With E. viridis R. T. Baker. 



Drawings of E. viridis (under E. acacioides A. C'unn.) may be seen at figs. 9-12, 

 Plate 52, Part XI of this work, and a larger drawing at Plate 180 Part Xl.YIlI of my 

 "Forest Flora of New South Wales." The latter has fruits with thin rims and 

 non-exsert valves. 



3. With E. salmonophloia F.v.M. 



Its fruits remind one of those of the Western Australian E. sahwnopJdoia F.v.M., 

 but those of the latter species are smaller, more shiny, have thinner and niore n^.arked 

 pedicels. (Original description.) 



For E. salmonofldoia see Part XVII, Plate 73. It may be added that the latter 

 is a large timber tree, with smooth bark, and different anthers. 



4. With E. Seeana Maiden. ' 



E. Seeana Maiden is another species with small fruits (which are, however, 

 domed), and a long operculum (more tapering into the calyx-tube in E. Seeana), leaves 

 different, and the bark of E. Seeana is smooth. (Original description.) For E. Seeana 

 see Part XXXII, Plate 132. 



5. With E. redunea Sehauer. 



E. redunea Sehauer var. anc/usti folia Benth., is another narrow-leaved, long 

 operculumed form. It is from south-western Austi'alia, and has no close affinity to 

 the present species. 



Other narrow-leaved species are E. angustissima F.v.M. and E. ajncukita Baker 

 and Smith, but they have no special affiirity to this species. (Original description.) 

 For E. redunea var. angustifolia see Part XXXIV, Plate 140. 



6. With E. oleosa F.v.M. 



E. oleosa F.v.M. bears an obvious resemblance as far as the fruits are concerned, 

 but those of the new species are smaller, and in leaves and in most other respects the 

 affinities are not obvious. (Original description.) It is amusing that, nevertheless, 

 I should have first recorded the Jericho specimen as E. oleosa. For E. oleosa see Part 

 XV, Plate 65. The latter species has, however, broad juvenile foliage. 



