163 



lems of American botany will be found full of valuable sugges- 

 tions along the lines above indicated. Most of them are public 

 addresses by well-known men, and nearly all can be found in the 

 library of the New York Botanical Garden. The arrangement is 

 chronological. 



Brendel, F. Historical sketch of the science of botany in North 

 America from 1635 to 1840. Am. Nat. 13: 754-771. D 1879; 



Do. 1840 to 1858. Am. Nat. 14: 25-38. Ja 1880. 



Gray, Asa. Remarks concerning the flora of North America. Am. 

 Jour. Sci. III. 24: 321-331. N 1882; Bot. Gaz. 7: 129-135, 

 139-143. 1882; Proc. A. A. A. S. 31 : 449-460. 1883. 



Farlow, "W. G. The task of American botanists. Pop. Sci. Mo. 31 : 

 305-314. Jl 1887. Abstract in Bull. Torrey Club 14 : 173-174, 

 Au 1887. 



McCarthy, G. The study of local floras. Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. 

 Soc. 4' : 25-29. 1887. 



Coulter, J. M. The future of systematic botany. Proc. A. A. A. S. 

 40 : 293-304. 1892. 



MacMillan, C. On the emergence of a sham biology in America. 



Science 21 : 184-186. 7 Ap 1893. (Discussed by four other 



persons in later numbers of the same volume. ) 

 Trelease, Wm. Botanical opportunity. Bot. Gaz. 22: 193-217. 



S 1896. 



Kearney, T. H. The science of plant ecology. Plant World 2 : 

 158-160. Jl 1899. 



Barnes, C. R. The problems and problems of plant physiology. 



Science II. 10 : 316-331. 8 S 1899; Proc. A. A. A. S. 48: 



263-288. D 1899. 



See especially pages 327-329 and 282-286, on ecology and plant names. 

 Halsted, B. D. The new field botany. Pop. Sci. Mo. 56: 98-105. 



N 1899. 



Trelease, Wm. Some twentieth century problems. Science 11. 12 : 

 48-62. 13 Jl 1900; Proc. A. A. A. S. 49: 249-272. 1901. 



Underwood, L. M. The last quarter — a reminiscence and an outlook. 

 Science II. 12 : 161-170. 3 Au 1900. 



Hitchcock, A. S. A brief outline of ecology. Trans. Kan. Acad. Sci. 

 17: 28-34. 1901- 



