on Pander's article "Beitrage zur Entwickelungsgeschichte 

 des Huhnchens in Eie" (Archives of Academy of Sciences of 

 of USSR, funds I, inventory 2, § 128, 1820)". In the 

 reply to the request to send a photocopy of this review 

 in the Archives of the Academy of Sciences of USSR on 

 April 3, 1951 (No. 783) it was informed, that "in funds 1, 

 inventory 2, 1820, § 128 there was the comment of the 

 academicians P. A. Zagorskii and A. F. Sevastyanov on 

 the article of Pander "Das Skelett der Knochenfische". 

 The comment on the article of Pander which is of interest 

 to you, is not found in the Archives of the Academy of 

 Sciences of USSR. There is only a mention in the proceed- 

 ings of sessions of the conference of the Academy of 

 Science on March 15, 1820 (§ 76) about the representation 

 by Pander concerning his published work "Beitrage zur 

 Entwickelungsgeschichte des Huhnchens im Eie" (264) . 



(75) Oken widely used the right given to him as an 

 editor to put his remarks and polemical discussions in the 

 strange articles which were published in "Izid". Thus, 

 publishing the major article of Dollinger, he combined it 

 with similar remarks, sometimes very unceremonious, as 

 exclamations: "Oho" and so on. 



In the stated article of Pander, many remarks of 

 Oken were mentioned (264) . 



(76) Aristotle arches, passing in the visceral arches 

 between branchiate slits, were not known to Pander, they 

 were discovered and described in detail later on. The main 

 merit in their study belongs to Baer (see Chapter 16) (266) . 



(77) Here Oken noted "It is absolutely clear, that 

 they were also formed of segments, he and ei?". Thus, the 

 idea about the non- embryonic blastoderm, as distinctly 

 developed by Pander, remained nevertheless obscure for 

 Oken (268) . 



(78) In the same place Oken again made a note in which, 

 in spite of obviousness, with amazing persistence, he repeated 

 his idea about bladders as the primary formations in the 

 development of the embryo (268) . 



(79) In this place, Oken made a funny remark: As we 

 have always confirmed, this was studied and represented in 



631 



