93 



tion from the above mentioned species. Preliminary investiga- 

 tions have brought out some interesting features, which the 

 author desires to study more critically before making a final 

 decision. Since another season will be required for the comple- 

 tion of this study, a preliminary note was deemed advisable. 

 It is quite possible, of course, that both A. balsamea and A. 

 Fraseri may occur in the state, together with the new form. 



The principal point of distinction between .1. Fraseri and 

 balsamea is a difference in the relative length of the scales and 

 subtending bracts of the fruiting cone. In A. Fraseri the emar- 

 ginate bracts are longer than the scales, with the upper part 

 conspicuously projecting and reflexed, whereas in A. balsamea 

 they are shorter and not projecting. The West Virginia plant 

 has the bracts shorter than the scales and is clearly more closely 

 related to the northern species. However, it appears to differ 

 quite markedly from A. balsamea in its more acute leaves, 

 larger seeds, and broader scales. 



There is an added point of difficulty in the fact that the 

 West Virginia material itself appears to represent two races, as 

 there are a number of striking differences between those col- 

 lected at Cheatbridge, and those collected in Canaan Valley. 



It is hoped that comparative studies continued during the 

 1934 season will serve to clear up the confusion that has existed 

 in regard to these West Virginia plants. 



Department of Biology, West Virginia University 



