154 



The following, 'referred to U. j^urpuranceus, Link, is donl)tful : — 



(766.) Eucalyptus purpurascen.s. E. textu Link, Enum. defiiiita, (j. 1., at Ijcne L-onvenit. Folia 

 horizoiitalia cordata (quod jure semper basi tantum intelligitur ; v. Fl. Port.) seniiamplexicaulia tantimi 

 (ad Link, Enum.), at cum opposita siiit, junctim sane amplexicaulia (quod tamen utrumque non plane idem 

 arbitror), subrepanda, margine nervis que supra quoque purpurascentia ; subtus sane glauca, et mihi albide, 

 pui-purascentique admisto. Margo tenuiter subrevolutus. — (Hofiing. Verz. PJl. Nachtr. 3, p. 36.) 



6. E. glohularis, Ilort., Ex. DC. Frod. iii, 219, under E. amyydalina. 



E. glohularis, hortul. (?). Folia 3 poll, longa, 3 lin. lata, alia basi sequalia alia hinc inrequalia. 

 Pet. et ped. 3 lin. longi. Fructus globosus grani Piperis magn. 



7. E. glandulosa, Desf. 



Ramis tuberculosis ; ramulis filiformibus ; foliis oppositis, connatis, laneeolatis, acuminatis. Folia 

 glaberrima, uncias 3-5 longa, lineas 4 lata, in acumen longum attenuata. An E. tuhercuJata, DC, Prodr. {'',.) 

 (Desf., in Gat. PI. Hort. Par. Ed. 3, 1829, p. 408.) 



See also : — 



Ramis tuberculosis, ramulis filiformibus, fol. oppositis connatis, laneeolatis acuminatis. Folia 4-5 

 uncias longa, 4 lin. lata. E. tubercuMa (1) DC. Crescit . . . (1). (W alp. Eepert. ii, 926.) There 

 are specimens in Herb. Barbey-Boissier bearing the label " Eucalj/ji/iii! i/landu.lusa, Desf., Culta." 



8. E. Lindleijana, DC. 



Operculo liemispha!rico submutico, pedunculis teretiusculis flures 3-5 umbellatas gerentibus, foliis 

 lineari-lanceola,tis, aliis petiolatis basi cuneatis subtequalibus aliis sessilibus basi obtusis. In Australasia (?). 

 E. longifolia, Lindl. in Bot. Reg. t. 947. Phrasis ex icone, sed descriptio nulla edita ob fruticem in hortis 

 mox post anthesin mortuum. — (DC. Prod, iii, 219.) 



According to Bentham (B.Fl. iii, 202) this is referable to E. amygdaUna, 

 Labill. 



An old specimen in the Vienna Herbarium (Collection Reichenbach, fil.), 

 labelled with an old label, " Eucalyptus Lindleyana, DC. Prod. 3, 219. E. 

 longifolia, Lindl. c." is E. amygdcdina, var. nmnerosa. 



9. E. longifolia, Lindl., in Bot. Beg., t. 917. Tlie brief description is : — 



E. longifolia; operculo hemisphserico submutico, foliis lineari-lanceolatis basi cuneatis subina?qualibus, 

 umbellis paucifloris pedunculatis axillaribus. 



Bentham refers it to E. amygdaUna. I have seen it, and concur. 



10. E. gracilis, Miq. non F.v.M. 



Specimen No. 3 (from Tasmania, C. Stuart) attributed to the above species 

 by Miq. in Ned. Kriddk. Arch. iv. 



11. E. tenuiramis, Miq. 



11. Eucalyptus tenuiramis, Miq. n. sp.: ramulis tenuibus gracilibus teretiusculis, foliis e basi 

 attenuata subsequali laneeolatis vulgo subfalcatis, apiculo recto vel curvulo terminalis, subcoriaceis, 

 punctatis, venis tenuibus adscendentibus tenere reticulatis utrinque cum costa subdistinctis, pedunculis 

 6-10 floris, floribus subsessilibus, calycis tubo obovato-conico striulato pruinoso, filamentis rubellis et flavis 

 (in sicco) antheris didymis. 



