114 



tictiatcly very broac? and partly protruding from the wings, the- 

 purplish apex included. 



This description is still deficient, for lupine flowers in the 

 dried stale do not show the various excellent characters which 

 arc apparent in the living state. 



Liiipiiiiis WatKoiii 



Lupinus aridus- var. Utahensis S. Wats. Proc. Am. Acad. 

 8: 534. 1873; ^'^^ ^- holoserieeus var. Utahensis S. Wats* 



"Racemes 3-6 inches long, shorter than the very long peti- 

 oled leaves; bracts setaceous, exceeding the flovi'ers; petals pur- 

 plish, 4 limes long, the banner shorter. — Parley's Park in the 

 Wahsatch (Watson)."' 



The above description, short and unsatisfactoiy as it is, as 

 well as the different geographical range, points t'o a plant dis- 

 tinct from the northwestern L, aridzis. 



Trilbliiini Andre wsii (A. Gray) 



Trifolium barbigerum vdiV. A-ndrewsii A. Gray, Proc. AnJ. 

 Acad. 7: 335. 1867. 



Trifolium Grayi I/OJa. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. 15-: 189. 1S83. 



li. these two names belong' to tlie same plant,- Gray's should 

 be adopted, as it is much old&r,, and is apparently the only jhv- 

 dreiusii in tlie genus. 



Trifoliuiii parvuiii (Kellogg) 



Tn/olimn pa2icifio7-um Q) w3iZ. pafvum Kellogg, Proc. Cal. 

 Acad. 5: 54. 1873. 



Trifoliuvi mulHcatile Jones, Bull. Torr. Club, D: 31. i832. 



Both these names have been credited to T. monaiiihiDn as 

 synonyms,. tiie former by Watson, who in the Bibliographical 

 Index perverts its meaning by placing the question mark rhus 

 ^— "var. (?) parz'um^'''' instead of ''paucifujrum (?) var. parvuui^^'' 

 as originally written by Kellogg; and the latter by Greene. 

 That . Kellogig's plant, collected at Cisco, and Jpne^' from, near 



