229 



6 Pinus Taeda 



5 Pinus glabra 



5 Liquidambar Styraciflua 



3 Acer rubrum 



3 Quercus lyrata 



3 Populus deltoides 



3 Betula nigra 



2 Fraxinus profunda?! 



Shrubs 

 9 Alnus rugosa 

 2 Sabal glabra 



Herbs 

 22 Tillandsia usneoides 

 4 Zizania palustris? 

 4 Scirpus validus 

 2 Cladium effusum 

 2 Phragmites communis 



14 Platanus occidentalis 

 12 Acer rubrum?* 

 ir Quercus nigra 

 8 Populus heterophylla 



7 Nyssa uniflora 



6 Fraxinus caroliniana? 

 5 Ulmus americana? 

 4 Quercus lyrata 



4 Magnolia glauca 

 3 Sabal Palmetto 



2 Quercus Michauxii 

 2 Hicoria aquatica 

 2 Gleditschia sp. 

 2 Carpinus caroliniana 

 2 Acer saccharinum 



Shrubs and Vines 

 24 Arundinaria macrosperma 

 14 Sabal glabra 

 II Vitis aestivalis? 

 II Wistaria frutescens 



8 Ampelopsis arborea 



5 Brunnichia cirrhosa 



5 Phoradendron flavescens 



2 Itea virginica 



Herbs 

 19 Tillandsia usneoides 



6 Zizania palustris? J 



3 Senecio lobatus 



Before discussing the significant features of this table it will 

 be in order to explain a few facts which the table does not show. 



The two pines mentioned in the first column did not grow im- 

 mediately on the banks of the river, but a short distance back, 

 presumably on ground elevated a trifle above the swamps. The 

 same might be said of a few of the species in the second column, 

 such as Quercus nigra and Carpinus. Betula nigra and Acer 

 saccharinum, here as elsewhere, seemed to be confined to the im- 

 mediate banks of the stream, leaning out over the water. Salix 



* See notes on this species in Ann. Rep. Fla. Geol. Surv. 3: 322. 1911; also 

 Bush, Gard. & For. 10: 516. 1897. 



t Or more likely the var. tridens, which seems to enjoy more alluvial habitats 

 than the typical A. rubrum. 



% Without flowers I could not be sure whether this large grass was Zizania or 

 Zizaniopsis. 



