82 Contributions to Oriental Herpetology. [March, 1905. 
specimen in the Museum (from Stoliczka’s Yarkand collection)+ 
which bears a label corresponding to the locality “ Kharbu, 
os ” in the register. By some error this individual is entered 
s Gymnodactylus stoliczke—a species so distinct from A. pipiens 
that it is hardly probable that any confusion can have been made 
between them. It is possible, however, that some accidental 
exchange of labels may have taken n place, and the latter Pm 
must be recorded as belonging doubtfully to the fauna of Bri 
India. It is desirable, if it does occur in Ladak, that tactial 
Distribution.—Turkestan ; Transcaspia. 
GYMNODACTYLUS OLDHAMI, Theob. 
G. oldhami, Theobald, Cat. Rept. Brit. Ind., p. 81. Boulenger, 
Faun. Ind., Rept., p. 38. 
The Indian Museum possesses the type and three other speci- 
mens of this Gecko. Except the type, they are from Lower Burma 
a tao,” a iti i 
type is recorded as from 8. Canara. This locality is more than 
doubtful. It was merely suggested to Theobald (loc. cit.) by 
eons, who did not take the species ie es in South India. 
Boulenger’s “keys” in the “ Fau ndia” and the 
“Catalogue” hold good for G. olathianad: mG. fasciolatus and G, 
variegatus, the types of all of which are in the Indian Museum 
but have lately been examined by him. 
GYMNODACTYLUS MARMORATUS, Gray. 
G. marmoratus, Boulenger, Cat. Liz. Brit. Mus. i, p. 44. 
The Museum has lat ge 8 a specimens of this species | 
from the Malay Peninsula xchange with the Selangor State 
aaa It is to be hoped that it will be sought for in Lower 
Burma 
GYMNODACTYLUS CONSOBRINOIDES, nov. 
The description is based on two male specimens, both probably 
immature, obtained in Tavoy a number of years ago by one of the 
Museum collectors, 
Diagnosis.—A form closely pitied to G. pulchellus ee Pay 
trace 
Bornean species (. consobrinu here is no 
preanal groove; probably the adult male has an Re 
straight series of preanal and ral pores, uninterrupted 
in the middle line and numbering about 26 young male 
these are represented by ee in a ro of enlarged 
scales. Th sal tubercles are smaller than in G. pulchellus 
and less distinctly keeled; the ventrals are larger; the ventral 
region is not marked off by a line of enlarged tubercles ; = “a 
