Voi. 1, N ep 3.] Contributions to Oriental Herpetology. 83 
LN. S.] 
plates on the ventral surface of the tail are not separated from 
the scales of the sides, as they arein G., pulchellus, by heterogene- 
ously shaped, slightly enlarged scales. The head is very slightly 
—s d in the frontal region. In the types the colours have 
a 
broader from before backwards; the enlarged dorsal tubercles 
are pale ; the lower surface is dirty pale brown. 
Measurements (Immature male). 
Total length we ay aS ee: 
Body i a oe Ss 
Tail ae ba ORS. ig 
Head ia pence © cae 
Breadth of hcstat ie co ao 
Fore-limb a Bexeoeee 2s 
Hind lemib as ee es 
have not been able to compare the specimens with examples 
of G. consobrinus ; but Mr. Boulenger regards them as representing 
a species int ermediate a some respects between G. Aggrnetge and. 
G. consobrinus. On the whole, the points in which t differ 
from the former seem 2 oe d rather in the direction of tne latter’s 
characteristic peculiarities. 
GoNATODES ANDERSONI, Annand, (Plate IT, fig. 3). 
G. eS Annandale, J.A.S.B. (2) suppl., 1904, p. 21, 
nce the description of this form was written two additional 
anéabaiare both from Narcondam, have been presen ed to the 
by Mr. C. G. Rogers. They agree well with the types 
and differ in the same respects as they do from G4. kandianus and 
G gracilis. On the whole they show that the Andaman (or 
Narcondam?) form is undergoing what is probably a parallel 
evolution to that which has produced Gt. gracilis. 
PHYLLODACTYLUS BURMANICUS, Annand. (Plate, I, fig. 1 ). 
bagi ee Annandale, Ann. Mag: NUE ee XV, 1905, p. 28. 
is smaller than in P. siamensis, bees 8 or 9 in the specimens 
examined (see As 1b, 2a, FL 1), , 
