Vol. I, No. 3.] Contributions to Oriental Herpetology. 89 
LN. 8.] 
AGAMA, sp. 
ere are two specimens of a large Agama in the collection 
which represent a species allied in some respects to A. nupta, 
AT ; ‘ 
e t origin is uncertain I prefer to leave them 
unnamed. The numbers on ir museum labels have been ori- 
ginally entered in the earns without particulars, but ‘Dr, 
Blanford. Persian collec 2” has been written in at a later date 
in pencil and the welled s Akai attached to them resemble those 
of the Persian Collection. 
They differ from specimens of A. nupta (of which I have 
examined a la ee ee) chiefly in the character of their dorsal 
nate and their bases do not overlap; some of them have almost 
the character of retroverted spines. Similar scales are scattered on 
the sides of the posterior part of the body, and there are others, 
AGAMA NnupTA, De Fil. 
A. Boulenger, Faun. Ind. Rept., p. 151. Alcock and 
Finn, TARB lx Ixy (2), 1896, p. 555. 
he verticillation of the tail, at any rate in old sige” may 
be Ee absent. The coloration is frequently an ost 
uniform brownish-bl The Museum processes a Chaructactelll 
but imperfect specimen from Chitral (Dr. G. M. Giles) 
LIOLEPIS BELLI (Gray) 
L. bellii, Boulenger, Fascic, Malay, Zool. 1, p. 155, An- 
nandale and oe abi (note). Aestandedls P. Z. S., 1900, p. 
857, and Ann: Mag. N. H. (7) XV, 1905, p. 32. 
e have several immature specimens from Burma which 
exhibit the characteristic “juvenile livery” so well marked in 
examples from the Malay Peninsula. 
? 
List or AGAMIDEZ TAKEN ON once Istanp By Woop-Mason's 
CoLLECcToR. 
1, Draco quinquefasciatus ory Goa specimens), 
2. Aphaniotis fusca (Ptrs.) (on 
3. Calotes jubatus (D. & B.) (cup SATE 
