Vol. I, No. 6.]- An Analysis of the Lankavatara Sutra, 163 
[N. 8. 
“The Samkhyas, Vaisesikas, Nagnas, Vipras and Pasupatas 
have taken the extreme views of ermanence and non-permanence 
“and are destitute of the discriminated truth. ’ 
The views of Kapila and Kanada are specially discussed on 
leaf 132. 
Not merely in the 10th but in some of the previous chapters 
o.the N eee ais Tarkikas are specially referred to. Thus 
in Bhs apter II we re 
aafaar: we ate ufaeita satan: | 
(A.S. MSS., Leaf 11.) 
The Tibetan version runs thus :— 
PLEIN ILE HSS | 
ARRSTSSTF ASE TAINS | 
“Tell me how in future times the Naiyayikas will flourish.” 
ag very first question asked by Mahaimati in Chapter IT 
au fe qua am we aa Gea | 
(A.S.. MSS Leaf lbdycsy cl cit of? 
The Tibetan version runs thus :— c 
RT PTAS | 
~ So care 
yy SWAT ASS | 
(Kangyur, Mdo, Vol. V., Leaf 93, A.S. MSS.) 
“‘ How is ratiocination corrected and how does it proceed ?” 
The following doctrine of the Tarkikasis specially mentioned :— 
aang fart: aig afeaTAs 77: | 
(A.S. MSS., Chap. X., Leaf 143.) 
The Tibetan version runs thus :— 
SNF ATASARTISATS | 
ang — 
AA AATA BHT S| 
