250 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. [December, 1905, 
UAT TST, SUUEIA, wafaaa, waite, vafaae, secure, 
TayQaal, weqarwatez | But this gives us no clue to the identi- 
fication of the sect, save and except that they were non-Buddhists. 
Haribhadra, however, tells us that these were Saivas and Hari- 
bhadra belongs to the fifth century of the Christian era 
subdividing sabda; subdivisions of sabda are unknown in other 
systems of philosophy. It is ila translated by the word, 
“dogma.” The distinctions between the Revealed Word and the 
Ordinary Word is peculiar to the hoetend ras. It is not Buddhis- 
tic, because they did not know of this subdivision. And in the 
fifth century, they discarded dogma altogether. Moreover, the 
introduction of this Sitra explains the introduction of the section, 
on the authority of the Vedas, and sone. with it, ofa quarrel with 
the Mimamsakas on the eternity o 
All this seems to be the work a a ; Hindu sect which we take 
to be the Saivas at the instance of ay tena These are a 
compromise between the Hindus and the “i ame 
been mixed up with two other systems of philosophy, which have 
been laterly interpolated into the 
n after a careful examination, I do not find the Nine 
Vv 
Reasons and Fourteen Fallacies abina to Aksapada hy the 
Chinese authorities. There are chapters on fallacies and ‘homo-— 
me 
is diving too deep into the antiquity of ee thought, ia our 
appliances are not sufficient for the purpos 
et 
