Vol. I, No. 10.] The Dates of Subandhu and Din-naga. 255 
[N.S.] 
and eighties of the fifth century a.p. . This, I think, is untenable. 
Takakusu makes two initial mistakes: (1) Skandagupta is not 
Vikramaditya but Kramaditya; and (2) he was not succeeded by 
Baladitya but by Pura Gupta. 
If k 
per name: it ly means “t g Sun,” the 
heir-appare this view of the thing is accepted, Dinnaga, 
th pil either of Vasubandhu or of , would write his 
oks in the first quarter of the fifth century; and by the time 
Haribhadra wrote, they would be well-known works. 
Candragupta Vikramaditya seems to have had two sons— 
Candraprakasa and Baladitya; of these Baladitya favoured the 
that “new men” came to the front, the old taste for poetry was 
gone, and everyone’s hand was at his neighbour’s throa 
PE LR PRR LE EP PPO SD 
