THE OOLOGIST 



VII 



You have certainly made a decided 

 improvement in the magazine, and I 

 want to be counted as one to help you 

 keep up the good work. It must he 

 appreciated by all the old-timers, as 

 well as by all ornithologists and oolo- 

 gists interested to have an up to date 

 magazine published for their own spe- 

 cial benefit. 



H. G. Higbee, Dec. 18, 1910. 



Miller T. Mercer, Dec. 17, 1910. 

 The Christmas number of THE 

 OOLOGIST at hand, for which you 

 certainly are to be congratulated. 

 Charles A. Hewlett, Dec. 17, 1910. 



I have taken THE OOLOGIST now 

 for over 20 years and think it is vast- 

 ly improved during the past year. 



R. B. Simpson, Dec. 20, 1910. 



It's getting better every day and I 

 wish you luck. 



A. H. Keeney, Dec. 23, 1910. 



I have taken THE OOLOGIST for 

 11 years now and would not be with- 

 out it at double the price. It has 

 shown a market improvement since it 

 has passed into your hands. 



Lucius H. Paul, Dec. 29, 1910. 



THE OOLOGIST is surely taking a 

 great brace. 



C. J. Pennock, Dec. 30, 1910. 



I certainly enjoy the little journal. 

 Dr. E. S. Schmidt, Dec. 31, 1910. 



The exchange and "for sale" col- 

 umns in the last issue covered as 

 much space as the whole OOLOGIST 

 covered several years ago. "That's 

 going some." 



Wm. G. Pitcairn, Jan. 2, 1911. 



THE OOLOGIST certainly has im- 

 proved and I am glad to see the good 

 work go on." 



J. F. Taylor, Jan. 3, 1911. 



I am pleased to note that it is im- 

 proving. 



W. G. Savage, Jan. 6, 1911. 



I would not be without it. 



C. S. Winch, Jan. 22, 1911. 



I have taken this publication ever 

 since it appeared a small leaflet over 

 30 years ago and feel that I could not 

 be happy without it. 



Mrs. Ella A. Wiswall, Jan. 7, 1911 



READ WHAT THE BIRD MEN SAY 



WE ARE DOING TO "THE 



OOLOGIST." 



I congratulate you upon turning out 

 such a good magazine for the money. 

 Frank S. Daggett, Nov. 26, 1910. 



I must congratulate you to your suc- 

 cess in improving The OOLOGIST. I 

 would not like to be without it a sin- 

 gle month. 



E. J. Dietrick, Nov. 27, 1910. 



You are certainly greatly improving 

 our little paper, and I wish you every 

 success in your efforts. 



J. H. Bowles, Dec. 4, 1910. 



I like THE OOLOGIST very much. 

 Margaret R. Gest. 



It's getting better all the time. 



B. R. Bales, Dec. 6, 1910. 



THE OOLOGIST seems to be better 

 than ever as an advertising medium. 

 I received live answers in reply to my 

 advertisement of scientific shells and 

 the duplicate sets of bird eggs, and 

 as I disposed of both please do not run 

 my "ad" again. 



C. F. Stone, Dec. 7, 1910. 



Allow me to congratulate you upon 

 the splendid magazine which you have 

 edited this year. 



R. J. Longstreet, Dec. 12, 1910. 



I am a subscriber of your paper, and 

 think it is a dandy. 



R. Ross Riley, Dec. 12, 1910. 



Hoping to see the 1911 OOLOGIST 

 grow as well as did the 1910 issue, I 

 remain, 



Wm. G. Pitcairn, Dec. 15, 1910. 



Your current number is quite newsy 

 and much improved in appearance. 

 H. S. Hathaway, Dec. 16, 1910. 



I have looked forward to the middle 

 of each month the past year with a 

 lot of pleasure, as there has always 

 been something of real, true interest 

 in every issue. 



THE OOLOGIST I think is getting 

 so much more interesting. It is nice 

 to see the photographs of the different 

 oologists and naturalists with whom 

 we correspond. 



Edward S. Coombs, Dec. 25, 1910. 



