XII 



THE OOLOGIST 



THE OOLOGIST is fiilling the need 

 as of yore to the layman and old field 

 collectors of twenty-five years ago. 

 - W. Otto Ewierson, Jan. 12, 1911. 



Please do not allow my name to be 

 dropped from the list as I do not want 

 to miss a single copy of THE OOLO- 

 GIST. 



Permit me to add that I very much 

 appreciate the improvement you have 

 made both in the appearance and the 

 subject matter. 



A. R. Shearer, Jan. 11, 1911. 



Please drop my little adv. in OOLO- 

 GIST. It cleaned me out of skins in 

 very short order. 



Robert P. Sharpies, Jan. 17, 1911. 



THE OOLOGIST is certainly mak- 

 ing continuous improvement under 

 your management. 



F. P. Drowne, Jan. 30, 1911. 



THE OOLOGIST is a tip top maga- 

 zine and very valuable to all nature 

 students. 



Alex Walker, Feb. 11, 1911. 



You are greatly to be congratulated 

 in this month's OOLOGIST. It is real- 

 ly a valuable number — I think the best 

 copv ever published. 



A. E. Price, Feb. 20, 1911. 

 The Feb. number of THE OOLO- 

 GIST is here and it is one of the finest 

 numbers I have ever seen. 



Wilson Tout, Feb. 21, 1911. 

 I must congratulate you on the im- 

 provements of THE OOLOGIST, as I 

 have been taking it from birth and 

 having a complete file, I can see 

 the improvement. 



C. B. Vandercook, Feb. 27, 1911. 

 You surely deserve credit for the 

 marked improvement which you have 

 brought about in THE OOLOGIST. 

 R. C. Harlow, March 2, 1911. 

 I think THE OOLOGIST is improv- 

 ing right along. 



Sidney S. S. Stansell, Mar. 7, 1911. 

 The paper is much better now than 

 it was. 



E. J. Darlington, Mar. 13th, 1911. 

 Your paper is fine and I don't want 

 to be without it, as it is a bundle of 

 facts and to be relied upon. One num- 

 ber of your paper is worth the sub- 

 scription price per year . 



Leon C. Skinner, Mar. 27, 1911. 



Many thanks for the fine magazine 

 you are sending us. 



E. C. Knapp, Mar. 20i, 1911. 



I have been obliged to suspend by 

 bookbinding work, but that ad has had 

 me answering letters every week. 

 This is a compliment for THE OOLO- 

 GIST anyivay. 



V^Tieeler McMillen, Apr. 13, 1911. 



I appreciate the fact that the maga- 

 zine shows a very decided improve- 

 ment since you took charge of it, and I 

 take pleasure in recommending it to 

 all bird students. 



H. O. Green, Aug. 22, 1911. 



The April number of THE OOLO- 

 GIST at hand and I congratulate you 

 on same. It is excellent and contains 

 many valuable notes and articles. 

 Paul G. Howes, April 26th, 1911. 



I think your paper is growing better. 

 George D. Peck, April 29, 1911. 



Also congratulate you on the many 

 improvements to the paper. 



J. S. A. Meeker, April 30, 1911. 



Allow me to take this opportunity 

 to congratulate you on the success you 

 seem to be having with THE OOLO- 

 GIST. The illustrations are especial- 

 ly worthy of mention, particularly 

 those of the Oologists whose names 

 we have been familiar with for years, 

 but whose faces we have never seen, 

 even in publication. . . with best 

 wishes. 



John G. Tyler, May 20th, 1911. 



I am sending you a coupon good for 

 two exchange notices if they had been 

 used last year. I am sending it not 

 for an insertion for exchange notice, 

 but for your trouble to take it out. I 

 just have had so manv answers, I 

 could not answer them all, I gave that 

 up long ago. 



"Ray Densmore, May 22, 1911. 



I can't afford to miss an issue. You 

 have put decidedly new life into it. 

 Ralph W. .Jackson, .June 4, 1911. 



I do not wish to miss a number, you 

 are certainly improving the paper 

 every issue. 



J. J. Schnieder, June 24th, 1911. 



T wish you every success in the fu- 

 ture and I must say that I am proud of 

 THE OOLOGIST in the past, and hope 

 that it will continue in its good work. 

 Geo. L. Cook, .June 30, 1911. 



