XIV 
“THE OOLOGIST is very much im- 
proved; in no way could I get along 
without it.” 
Edward R. Addams, Dec. 26. 
“Accept my sincere appreciation of 
the improvements which are evident 
under the new management.” 
Howard N. McMillan, Dec. 30. 
“THE OOLOGIST is a ‘Cracker 
Jack’ as an exchange medium.” 
F, T. Corless, Jan. 2. 
“T congratulate you on the improve- 
ment in the paper.” 
John L. Nichols, Dec, 24. 
“Let me congratulate you on the 
way you have brought THE OOLO- 
GIST up to its present goodness.” 
Earl S. Price, Jan. 6. 
“T have taken THE OOLOGIST 
since 1893 and would not care to be 
without it.” 
G. F. Dippie, Jan. 6. 
“T like the magazine very much.” 
Earle Cassidy, Mar. 17. 
“Perhaps it will not be out of place 
here to speak a word of praise. The 
pictures are fine and add much to the 
paper. The quality of the paper upon 
which it is printed is the very best 
and gives it a fine appearance. Hivery- 
thing considered, it is by far the best 
bird paper published.” 
John T. Parsons, Jan. 8. 
“THE OOLOGIST has certainly im- 
proved since you have taken hold. It 
is a fine little magazine.” 
J. J. Schneider, Jan. 9. 
“The little paper certainly is im- 
proving; my only fault with it is that 
it does come oftener and that there is 
not more of it.” 
EB. P. Walker, Jan. 24. 
THE OOLOGIST 
“Please send me the January num- 
ber; I can’t do~- without the little 
OOLOGIST.” 
Logan Evans, Jan. 10. 
“T have been pleased to note the im- 
provement in THE OOLOGIST since 
it came into your hands.” 
Dr. F, P. Browne, Jan. 21. 
“I want to say I enjoy THE OOLO- 
GIST about as much as any journal 
I get. It seems to take me back to 
those days of keen enjoyment when 
as a youngster I would ramble over 
field, and through the woods without 
the present day too much scramble for 
the almighty, A little more of this 
today would do away with many of 
our patent medicine houses and would 
give us the health we desire. 
Dr. E. S. Schmidt, Feb. 2. 
“Please accept my congratulations 
upon the improved appearance of the 
magazine.” 
W. Leon Dawson, Feb. 17. 
“You are making THE OOLOGIST 
a fine paper. I have taken it for 24 
years and it has always been worth 
50ce. Hnough said.” 
J. W. Sugden, Feb. 20. 
“THE OOLOGIST is getting better 
every month and is sure worth dou- 
ble the price.” 
M. A. White, Feb. 16th. 
“THE OOLOGIST is better than I 
have ever seen it before, and hope it 
will continue to be as good if not bet- 
ter than it is now.” 
S. S. S. Stansell, Mar. 3. 
“THE OOLOGIST looks much bet- 
ter than it ever has since I became 
a subscriber about ten years ago; I 
wish you all kinds of success and good 
luck.” 
Stanley Y. Jewett, Feb. 28. 
