394 
THE GARDENERS’ CHRONICLE AND AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE. 
j Aram 23, 1864, 
are in the | condition 
* ARMIGER,” who debe his case as fol 
* The land in question m Make of a 
ip; the Grass ie such as is 
on cold wet elay, d in its ens ent st: € 
worth above 20s. per acre. A year 
st 
I sugges sted, as recommen 
rowing the surface, sowing with Gra 
dressing with the mixture of guano, dusdive r 
and salt recommended by Professor Voelcker, : 
Sae 
inisieie will cost 37. 
repay such an outlay; a 
already to 00 poor r would prove injurious. 
and that to cut hay on 
be done 
The answer to this question must be based b 
he 
the undoubted "ei aoe ected truth, that 
Grasses, like t crops ads grow, 
egre for their osen aic su he fitne 
tte pian soil as regards both testare ae pec 
tot 
be 
ar 
ss 
nk on it. ETE sik 
ease of ordinary infertility, to 
D the "ud not containing the 
in question. 
m the face o 
‘our Co berespondent | 
What duci 
ood 
, or at any rate not yielding |t 
it. In such a case, the seeds of the crop will be 
Y here 
(now? Has there been a greater - demand for Grass | 
€: Ve ze and Turnip 
eed than usual? - 
on one M that alteration anagem 
extremely slow ; so that ae but little change 
noticeable at once. And i 
s must, however, ultimately tend to 
In the records of us 
r. Morton the 
o 
19s. 6d. and 2 
bou 
eut annually. Dur ring the years ist " 1839 the| b 
rice of wool ranged between 50s. per 
dh of tbe v 
e baee 
w | 
e | freedom 
ves 
the rae commercia al 
| a tenant’s improv 
x — de few men co rene will expose their families 
or from personal "d for the City of Lone Eos 
cra adle, of civil, r elig s, and personal ETE the 
loya d ordi, 
to our good a 
where pre ope riy 
capital flov 
cit whl the late Baron Rothecks d, 
Pci the To uld, in his examina. 
nancial 
rds’ committee, named the fin 
But why do nob a tenant have th 1e ri 
1 
t 
transfer is lease ? ight 5 to sell or 
An 
is mp and 
desire to ex, a 
r improve his 
is the very so oul of 
hale. 
a positive c cruelty and inju 
such a risk. 
" Altogether farming is 80 embarrassed and | fettered 
erprise or progre s with our general mang. 
in e 
e| praire cres ial, or thet intors The fear of 
loss of political influence is zea e, for that 
influence is exercised now by both p and so it 
eam be then, for you cannot make men all think one 
iis ie at a Aree to re that the greater 
culture would do what it 
crops, too, 
e essentia dirige be 
tants out of which that dandition origin- 
arose. 
d which does not contain Ae food of Grasses | 
e surfaco To thereafter 
of 
civem aot’ 
- 
E 
the Dirga flock 
| We should be M3 to see the prices of ‘eit and | è 
utton rising, and thus proving that a larger 
number of sheep and reete than ei are bein 
towns— Milan “the vidus of propert 
andlord's emend It has been Fatal od 
MUR that the mere facility of er of 
land would add 10 per cent. to its value. am quite 
ure that it ld attract to it many improvements; 
| just as we see new vea d tenants in towns, 
Under t have mentioned, our good 
old City of London is te actually rebuilt; con 
venient, s euet; - ud business palaces rear 
their heads ont the s : Aes antiquated dilapidatoria, 
ix 
o 500 per cen nt. ZA good deal of it about the 
xchange is now worth 1,500,000/. per acre, and a site 
out the size of a nobleman’s inris room would, if 
path the Royal Exchange, command a ground rental of 
10007. per annum, equal to the rental of a thousand- 
HUE 
farm 
will rev oss, in spite both of harrowing | kept over to another seas “Ik bE tates that could be enormous 
and seed ; and land which, water-logged, will not i fod ratus Gch to Ge ou rf 
IM the | of Grasses whether it be present at large b ee means as I hav aere 
; or not, will continue to yield Sedge and Rush IS d A BUSINESS? HABUI of poverty and wb 
inspite of e effort may be made. The Is me | e E fo a respectful but w chy pr indent 
first step to its í yis at e e on at I something | 2¢tion, no all alte with the best and most 
erga correspondent has already taken. - 5 — fedings as betw and man. echi. 
undertaken to a living by, end py ough T" 
lend must be drained, and thus be at once causes it to be Lu profitable, I can see nothing Apri 
locked el fertilised. ‘Dame — Nature's top- withdraw it from the rules and customs that iue ais TP. sl follo owing truthful letter addressed to me b 
dressings,” to which we "oA a Ac agricultu lady ini Worcestershire: MM pm wai 
writer is direo ting attenti mns of a ordinary m! capital is attracted and | worthy of consideration, Cortini EE ped e 
veni would thus have a pons of enter- | flows more freely into channels where its course is Med to A mo will not flow as its 
voe red, 
ing the so; ein ew S which re red and unobstructed, and it is naturally diverted fi eu eat 
would p of fi those encumbered Ly obstructions. That rule, in ge “ Sir,—I have waited, but in vain, bo a know rms ó proposal 
oe whew are inteidod je: and it woul ato be | Opinion, holds good equally for agriculture. nothin do E aD T famen »" s daro press ‘te quant 
of other food w may then be Filling = British stomach is in my opinion the most Mom P holding land to y T4 tm bold 
important trades and manufactures, and meta der X Bo thankful [S Id ere 
bà with some chance o fits answe ring its | in Tena oe t mn should — t ^ ipata PX vA aA ee Eas PL 
o ecia y conducted upon the | pi i Jass and profession, 
Phe Bailiff is quite right in his proposal to} eim iutelligent lar recognise s of commercial ont MEUM CRM na a ig Panes ao so. d 
cay eee a rien v after — his will | equity. But so ma sped ? In my opinion|bave we farmers done? Do we not io if we Mal 
use whatever n: supplies of certainly not. "There is no free trade in it, but i it is sowing our money, and little knowing "i woul 
fond for pi c re soil contains. T ad ition 4 eke ait ois nu ep 7 Vorsonal wrong, bub being 
. d m ers " 
is other t actices; Can Iw onder then that agri- | an panui I t get tes odai by mi mr. ears 
li eulture is SN, e comparatively unremunerative. | sw eich e prat oir ME England, g et ready bee 
cn or twelve bushels of bono dust een jn | 2m constantly told by pee that 2 is ver d eed from ; but for personal loss few think about tie Lael e adr 
geve ral times its Mie f dam dl yates ha suffici capital to give full lop- | | many hundred farmers in England are y early Snore eligible 
tes vane d to Ey the ment to the powers of on soil. I vit rid ae of the | iS for ek robo pin genet rom T, pe no help; - 
question for the present the game preserves and the ? t they may, sell st 
ess is th the" imere ideni Pen ich in a power over men's political Hey ce and take e Ab, e oor d aons bo mako 1 dx. pay y thoro m ga 
the evidence that exists of| mere question of tenure. In this respect I can see no | mo unk in venture that or propose t 
| cause for difference between town and count; Macs age si ener pir not be a di d apis this rd 
process of foddering| If you let a house in a town rader or manufac- | $2 ejectment ? A arm. though taken yearly, i per 
land; and you have then | turer: ly tenure, depending in fact on the will of |in good faith of holding for years; to inso posti 
i the ou may rest well assured that that | manent S ther Insuran d not be more oper a mn 
for i fe rim tenant ill do zothing & improv than us =S rance effected; and surely Do tenure- 
led ix ^; marty. But meee der EPGE 1t ^ ier qo yout cere E y ce AD alone ring it v 
. . p ; sci 
A in Sensvatiog | suppor tat he would reps of that lease unless he | es e Ee Reis ere es 
H transf. 1 d d eases would aval emse! » 
Dun be -— use, TU "nd S * in an — in all all — io küowledgo. = e peers o run land out, and poo a 
y, it may € = a py as P an earthen nothing against it; you ask nothing from Pg, made gut 
compost as can bar ad ite ah road d own and I co "multiply tt by | see your Soray y 'your outlay. A man O the agent ks 
3 10usands. o. o! UE reel usiness on lease, | outlay often has to endure very mue " and 
ec ara io and | thousands.” T hold both my places of b 1 tlay often has to endure h, because the ena pa 
velis S f. ush S—if|and have expended on them in permanent and other - nip A Le € e e Fis would Cn 
e ew years of partu pret, g eoret iiprodamients over AE ‘Should I have done so then 1 Pas at pes point out any benefits to bear, Jobs 
ing, ne and diligent peck on the | without the power of s nsfer? One of these | from this insurance that I really think, if brought"? sight o 
Grass it shall fs nrend impr” 
si still appear to be req they ten held under the Corporation. of London, and apiri e aa ee Ater schemes oro pid 
; beli , farms and era wou: 
but they were never known to object toa suit- "i, ci may be renee (but don't hint at t vr vedi other de 
HM wok v at T3 a dele d mutton with ee «| able tenant, and We Wee bean houses and lands av Now, there =n eL pat Alder T ruri. Lt La 
wool ; while Wheat, Barley, and | ^re a ntt a men oj who invest s p 
dai dra „and h c Anois por bushe freely canta although itis well ty avenging ERE LUE. brow beaten young farm ib might gir 
cy ary combination o . , that at the expiration of leases t ue 
; will be the effect of them, if the shoul con. | Vill ta rentals and participate (as they ought 
, y 
tinue, upon the character of agrivaltare P|. ia) ta rot ti mane a of te Basel st Ah STEAM CULTIVATION T fr 
t is at the seed time of the year that the x ege our a 
nce M ti ments. AVING had my attention drawn to Y «wet 
of the market demand for lar 4 ing of OTF: 
ue if W particular | mands a preference, if willing to give the pa or near Biar Hn efie ceto the working and 
- vehi at all. up uud gs mediis br ue Corporation surveyor. M team Ploughing, qoem shall alway® 
à Prices tenant is ejected on political or religious is grounds Compay; gladly respond tl 
