s H deny that t oubl 
depth of water nt ordinary spring tides of 24 feet as a member of the Privy ari Sub euer rur we rch has a teal 
6 bene over the entrance; the other, the steam b called the s Judgment The Church. of Englan d depen ix 
of 7 acres, with 25 feet 6 inches depth of water. He es not admit the e e which has been | prosecutions and decisi 
The evidence is unanimous that this acco esp on diviso that the clergy in general are for- É 
is inadequate for the ordinary requirements | bi by the oath of suprem acy to discuss the g to her | 
e vy, even in time of peace. Vari ous|reasons of the Committee of Privy Council for the The tore 
opinions h b given as to the number | advic has tendered to the Crown. Those mm teach ont out of the Prayer B. Book t Pe 
of additional first- class docks required, a me wit- who too t view wote perhaps. unaware th a the m © Chura, “and She ole of thet the Bible is for us "us the lew 
nesses conside which has ex th : ingle lié ^ au itine RUF 
are required. As to the extent of the additional sion is an Mou different document from. ne repor ourt la ince the Court received 
repa ring basins required, tl J rmn the may be that py. 4^ 
20 t acres are nec ; and it was urged by some | that the so- called judgment js a statement the ERES V » uz end S, V 
f the witnesses that, instead of mooring the ships in guidance of the suitors and the publie wh which the clergy. "S it is «t % be thought that ee à 
dinary in the harbour, economy and safety would be | advice to the Crown will be based, whic h m ap tot 1 mine been Phas y ghi by the fear ot =a 
best secured by placing these ships in a vot never reaches the Crown at all; and th the eport to | whic ‘act, we If one 
hat purpose. T ctory establishment is stated | the Crown happily omits the gr adit ot the preme will be hoc 
to be capable (or nearly so) of effecting the repairs and | and confines itself to advising briefly what the judg- | in the 
refitting of the fleet. A site, the property of the| ment should be. His Grace then proceeds to speak on IM a 
Crown, but subject to certain rights way, ver e theological topics involved, and to point out what m hó A 
prising about 93 a bounded by Fountain | is the ner of the judgment upon the position of the i 
ake, and covered a h water, hunsedidlnl y Church. Hesays— pne d 
contiguous to the no end of the abso. AS rion obse org o that »w 1ch iinet The | of cour 
is stated by .unanimous evidence to be attributed to the judgment than it osorvos Q einn. 
: of ding in tbe Court of Ar ised a two- | Our pre 
cellent site for the proposed works. The ol » fold rj ht of ap ag Either party may appeal M ether on the tesching the pure wor 
id to be of stiff clay, rendering piling | iaae mission of the articles of oberg, ° à ^- temone being | hear an pem 
nnecessary, and of good quality for making bricks, A | pronounced. An appeal at the vc o stages prenne per age 
poe convict establishment being Cohtirdodk the hiter fi SE Lg "im, what Pasagi the) latter wigs Ti obscure the wider horizon, and we know that 
Committee are informed much of the work can be | confined to the much narrower question, Do certain quo oted brought the pure Gospel to us in ‘salah through pa 
: of trouble is able to preserve it to us for the time 
passag s deserve, as heretical, th [2 r 
tha 
se me by E ‘ioe as is the case in similar 
orks at Chatham Dockyard. The Committe a we 
sposi on 
FE 
the Com mmi itte ee have x to the conclusion—1. That 
is require the site recommended is well 
Tha 
adapted " the pur ^ se. The Committee proceed to 
report at once e their opinion upon that b ranch of their sé 
the 
pu. 
the ebd MODE up, ven rebote of certain 
streets, roads, and landing places, preparatory to the 
SovTHAMPTON.—It is in contemplation to pull do 
the oy piece » b "bilia IL of jhe ancient citadel 
of Southampto: t was built 
this Darrèr form ; ah e e em, 
E. eee t of Arches, & not RA its or or the reforma- 
a of the articles of charg t was an oes against the Freland. 
peniti d notan bea pod mEt 2 ce f the ecg 3 
If the ju pak y the on ee of Arches cag in mittin THE ALBERT MEMORIAL.—The site of 
CM, | rejecting any pas aes her f retical, eiti either saa oul have Albert Statue has been again the occasion of ml 
ë Leti: T è opinion of the aua what pas Mister n the | discussion in the corporation of Dublin, 
Wis dle, and what were not at variance with our | absence of the Lord Mayor and the leadin; 
41, | articles rand formulates eit oy pets te ght MM at a IA the council, was cal 
the lar; anges directed th e to be made in : n 
articles of charge the quotation still admitted would give a rescinded the resolution granting the site 
wrong idea of the unsound teaching a tiie de fendant, he might Green, and refi rre the matter to a spec 
have his remedy with the Court a mi might ha DIM » for further consideration. At tha 
isted thi sions and alte terations r^ we by the judge of | know He jest; 
Arches. Butin each case the woe er waive Ro = right vM. . 
of appeal, and neither easelcame to the ith appeal | OT not, as no communication on the a 
agai e punishment. I purposely refrain frome expressing rapa by the Lord Mayor. 
any pinion "Y to pu jugment of the E e rt Ae A T boss the coun neil, however, the Lord-Lieutenant ti 
this is beyond t ave impose myse! uiv ay 
that whatever may be A of that —— ipe ^ra the or which y Queen addressed to lina: 
ep Mires of sen “ee the pro ted content | Subjec ack as 
pia te "ms atan wed the ground . t e Com: aje 
Seer partitus to travel over. n then moved that thi 
the follows that qe "Comites Kat Council has pronounced no hond Notis the 
reign e ‘King "Stephen. The «vri in whic h the 
citadel was entrusted to a a knight by Edward the Bla ck 
isin 
Prince. 
The 
quis of 
castle which he built. While he resided in it, Pether, 
the fi oonlight 
e remains of the citadel belonged | to the founds in d 
Lansdowne, who included it in a| th 
viou any been re alee pow 
LIN Ex& 
in ut as thematter of the anm is on Wednesda 
b Aces. it is competent a the accused i party to explain fiot 
-— of his work the ing o = ny pas 
m painter, and the Margravine of sago or 
ach were his neighbours. he owner of the aod “that fo, challen nged Ae the We may infer fro as benc to attend the ban 
ballium wall bas offered to let it stand for 1007, and an LA worda that the Court will not- havo reg regard d to any other pic coe ei paman 
attempt is now making to raise the money by subse 1P- | the accused resorts to other parts of his w. des vd explain away Avlamin 
tion. Mr, Pettigrew, of the Archzological Association, | the Lye pr the ma follow: hift into the’ seme h t 
has writen to the Corporation, d hem to save | ground to? z refut ind orn moy ger certes have | received + e 3 
: en heard, withou T re elle 01 passage ou z 
Fas relic. ig ors ibo: Castle was sold and pulled | 5° doubt shall exist in the mind of the Court whether Conyngham. V 
own at the marquis's death. the a " quest ition be her eue esl. or bo dev vold P 
,, SHEFFIELD, —All the LN claims arising out 
pu he 
iin been satisfied ; 
al 
er 
o , a vi which suffered greatly from 
the , and where large deposits of mud and filt 
have € met lie ever tomy the disast 
Sr. —Mrs. on qs wid of the 
late an. Andrew Senton ar, for some time resident 
at 8, this town, i ecently bee 
residing Pr el |o wi h her family, for the p 
of her sons acquiring the French language. 
an 
water. The eldest boy, Andrew, with a net having a 
handle, and whilst in the act of ense I v the | E 
tank. e tutor, Mr. Jeanes, imm Mer unged |* 
into the tank tg lifted the tothe he LE 
boy takin d of the handle of the hing — 
by pem ro was held up for more than h 
The tutor being seized by cramp or injur aed: eink t to 
rise Pe aoa 
Andr ve 
alt though a good swimmer. The sms 
the whole time, imploring help; and at last, finding he 
eould hold no o nga, told the little boy to run for help, 
and to give o his mamma, and went to en 
since bó een 
followed to the grave by his i dies. at d To 
MM Tottenham’s school, where he was to have ned 
Yorx.—The Archbishop o ihi. Ey 
mad letter to the clerg 
His Grace remarks tha 
t 
tas "i. 
epidium pis ‘the 
ce ae n of 
Binh de urine soppored 1 = “be € d, and which 
i hi and gen "— Mert 
seem to compe 
order to re ai "ia ceca an 
O have admitted in their i frst 
tthe Church of England is falling 
i etl 
of|of all ing, the not 
even a glance into the "fut of the "OG in fo to yon 
yv here 
n | points in the Pire i to which t tite demati “do tint apply, 
‘nd | ear 
it with meaning, bu y boun eed ui T d d eid heretical in 
itself, rather to co sider altogether. This | jahourer ers, 
atrio rulo — tiisa the faneto ovs is of the ‘Court unduly, and 8l 
ariance with the of other Courts in the | estate at Slane 
us M of à libe ; but M is no Mei to the faith of | present there or not, he i 
the xm ww i pae escapes censure ae the Court 
E a cm ended seek asaistance else- 
bern has mo bel raed cane, in spite of 
the explicit disclaimer th ‘the e judgment, many rsons persist | Can 
in bey ting it ET acquit us the whole 
work called ‘ only two | £o 
aad sl about which, afte: 
pe unreason actly 
rall these limitation 
iaquicted—I, moan 
s, the br ves 
Stott 
THE GENERAL ASSE T it 
the Gereral T of er dhe Charch e: o! 
opened on the 19th instant by y ual eeren 
- vor G 
mmissioner, with the 
he | retiring Moderator, Dr. Crai 
psp 
?s Church, after 
e | of Aberdeen, was herbes inda y of 
bibl ks that he d the year ensuing. The Gen neral A 
coy i: Lo d tbi y seine Te thas bend Boles Church was opened on n th 
Tet article, and this he thus ex| The ^ 
ME of God’ is contained in Scripture, ‘whence it it ‘diel not | tio 
TL t it i aerem T2 it.’ d appellant 
s in ein ie t free from 
herens that the Bible 1 UR the: produstion of gh recat human 
beings, which other devout human beings are entitled to criticise 
ing for the pe of peti 
free ely that seeing the Pra ayer Book speaks of the Church as in- ed t 
hat is call he Clerico- 
spired we ought not to shrink, from d inspiration to 
"true hear ui in rely be e fallible, but, Ei — 
ought rai j Yedüde ut’ th eory at hye purena of | Pied , 
prophets Rey ipdan to the anne evel and cones that those | clerical, were 
Israelites of old m: eee ee fallible also ; and that the inspiration | were e 
wh write e Bible is the same in in ki das} manner in which 
against its en 
demand its repe 
A LS 
adds, e 
clearly shown. lai 
Committee of of Oeil, 4o broken the x ofthe Church, 
and to havo advisedly e what was he 
doctrines of the Church in her articles and for “age ries. 
Me — concur in the advice to be given to the ree dete P 
tes recorded their dissent from — Mt the folge reach 
an The archbishop concludes his letter in the following c 
terms:—"Thave Paer aiana e the twogrest questions which 
have troubled men’s minds—the A of the Bible and the | * Steamer while on shore in 
punishment of the unpenitent sinner. It would be vain to ! sloop, with all gail set, on 
TT 
