Jews 25, 1864.) THE GARDENERS’ CHRONICLE AND AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE. 
Summary Procedure (Scotland, Bill passed through committoe.— when he declared that the statements made i Sir John Hay | defended the Bill, and justified the omission of 
LORD CHANCFLLOR P. Boo ^er of the| were unfounded. Tho disasters which» had occurred | polis from its operation, 3 After some p 
R il et of - were patent to the world, and it was the e gee ger Mrs ED M * be 
duty of - ak tm—À to challenge the conduct 
ern having caused it.—Lord PALMERSTON MM 
second reading of 
ting (ireland). Bill, the det of which ae 
with — Ireland to run one train a 
services, "yx aumabers r. B ed as 
by long enar ca long picsdings, prm rm were— 226; Against it, 233; Majority for 
sary writing. The Bill proptend 1o re md Yo the G A result was lo mdly cheered SA the 
a specific contract with the client, and to take security for | Ministerialists, and co e dibabed 1 by the Opposition. The 
E- to be incurred. ame House then went into ume ie of supply y^ form, but 
ve x5 the purchase ersi i e | immediately n rwards med. The Report on Suppl, o e 
f Chancery with regard ired t up and agreed passe 
woman after her marriage. gi aai A B N w of Part . Briou, Mr. itteo. The Lunacy (Seotland Del) wes read 
al istributi and | M. Gipson said it was in tention n fiA “Governmest to| TuEspay,—Court o cry 
i ce a measure for the amendment of the law of part: sitting the House we 
not to have included | the Conference Mae og He 
the Bill should be ener H fie ob Mr nnnm eg X C EDS Mma tr fou flock 
a - | House.— ANCELLOR r o É 
—Lord CRANWORTH MR jer, said that it would aga Fare to have | w. comm; vided, ind the motion of Mr. Whltesidé | 
though he gave the measure a qualified approval. in the usual way.—Mr. DISRAELI «X carried against the Ax 42 to 41.—On the 
then read a second time and referred to | . Im the present critica mption of business at 6 o'clock, Sir C. O 
of Seats (House of Commons) Sin w onjune! j i i |b he had b spem voted ín tho wrong lobby on the Dourt ot 
> ias Án eme Acts Aw m Bi ll i ice.—Mr. O 3 aid t | viue | (Ireland) Bill His vote was recorded in Red 
o hac , majority, 47 pe — - the division list might be am — 
s position in which the 2 un 2 was by pla icing pa h the “ Noes” instead of wi 
oi) Bit, s aced at the present pot nary he ho -— some member of the | '' Ayes. Bane de 
hird d me 2 po ee ware would rov what de of si gnifican cance attached | and learned gentleman 
tal ten T red by Earl Russell m anciber place, that the — dao 
ny ooh = any servico it might be 2 
time. 
Tuv ‘onference.—Earl Russert said that last called à wpon. E rtake. shed ow whether this 
week, in crm 2 ^ Earl of Derby, he stated that in a few | was merel rt of her is defec! 
days the Conference would either co gree mit the snicidal et d ave no law c h can put € 
posto rre = — mem off and hostiliti tie: — ith ny.—The | int vent bribery, le thee? 
al aid 1 e was sorry that any should to 
ition in which the 
ede - A ber e the quud ons of Mi Mr. bisesti 
rne.—Mr. D. Gnrirrira deprecated the con- 
of voting as if it were 
- re instead M a 
lso because 
ko 
If, — he case, 
milt, med Earl of SHAFTESBURY re; rded the a - questions with reference to the Conference but "he c che o of W ho 
— practices which might me objec Gove: ent, 5 hongt nt ec lord wees to be in his 
able Tad to motion and distatbance. He an. Y" sinn. TLord Pa ton here entered the Hou — m bebi: = 
an emendment, i that. the Bill be read a second time on that day the Speaker's mar was pe ved with rs from 8 regri 
LI. -— —The Bill was also opposed by the Lord CHAN- | Ministerial ter] ai le 
d Earl et Ultimately, the amendment was = formation of f Lord M 
NM, i the second reading of the Bill was to — Mr. Disraeli and Mr. Os! ERSTON 
The (Ireland) Bill was read a second , first to the question of Mr. Osborn rne, and said that 
Banking of usse the — in mlerenod to the fleet in 
EL : general sense ; on . 
Frin. ot G Briti o anywhere admitted that the bein of emigration from Ireland during the 
mí i to th last few years was considerable. At the rame time it should 
n be remembered, that when the population of the country was 
80 unie more than four —— vos Heint of La and raed for 
or.) © d t ana not A 
by the ; : 
slave trade.—Royal Academy.—Earl of STANHOPE dr y sr the 0 p d I 0 t been 
tion to the present position 4 of the Royal Academ; y of her Government rth apparent, 
de steps the Government intended tal x Tue p this Conferenas Di befo nr za d ind was Tow onder tiva! nt 
[Left sitting.] delay. M. uut mt reminded the 1845. The Present —_ beg m Bloom 
Mer 
that the 
sy 
Dolt onttoa OE the fuse ME; MAONI Salt 
ey ee 
OU OF COMMONS. dni = 
ere Ahantes War. .—On the order for going into | prolonged.—Lord PALM 
“ was naturally felt 
of supply, Mr, J. Hay a resolution eri gar f iem p 
Wr | tied as to de touring in sain to bri: the belligerent he 
preserving health ters were n 
Los mte pd Ed ree ah 4 See ‘ould be 
was ir fan! Government 
Hour un MULT ep Aer pee uem 
Iri: is 
rr i 
its duties and toa 
eie unu i 
that MES would M the. of I d vd miie mts those 
ri some M ef eatin my ens people of 1 rela ment in 
"T risum Ae What he letiented wes not thes © Shieh people 
ECT the wp bra ki amine: but that in consequence of a combination of 
de cumstances, a state of things ‘which had 
passed a the country was not in 
i 
E 
s$ 
i 
of the peo 
that Mr. Hennessy should 
his rest satisfied with ay “debate rae es taken place, 
ion to 
e 
. the w 
; G^ Pio de nt 
eere im. de Admira t; 
F opposition to the measure 2 
tralising MD LIAC — 
a D 
State for the Home ual aded wiely in withdraw ; ; land) Bill.—The A 
ing the 4th clause, — contended that that the House oM im 
ie prisoners — nto committee, for the purpose of 
rse ought to be taken with reference to this Bill, in 
Govern 
of Derby was a leading suem bet whioh bud omfertakcen time. The Misemed debate on the third dro vf the 
of the native tribes on the Gold Coast.—Mr. Bill was resumed Bir J. j ener ig who | of 
was not hen he | moved as an mm ae that the Bill be read a third € be m counted 
protectorate of the native tribes had been undertaken | that day three months. He Aw Aer. the Bill was pti E i 
jovernment of which Lord I Derby was a member, as the | unnecessary interference on the part of the Government with | to. do. )n the onder for going into c — n the Joint Stock 
bad arisen so long ago as 1820. Nor was he correct the existing system.—The Cua rief on the EXCHEQUER | Companies ( Voting Papers) Bull, Mr ORA. moved that the 
