380 



94. Peuc^a ruficeps, Baird?; Baird, Rep. p.486. — Ammodra- 

 mus ruficeps, Cassin. 



Three examples, Oaxaca (March 1858). I have no examples of 

 Peuccea ruficeps of California, and am consequently unable to say 

 positively that this is the same bird, the species in this group of 

 Finches requiring a close comparison. In my own collection are 

 three specimens of this same species of Peuccea obtained by Botteri 

 at Orizaba. 



95. Atlapetes PiLEATUSjWagler: Sclater, P. Z. S. 1857, p. 304. 

 State of Oaxaca. 



96. Embernagra rufivirgata, Lawr, 

 Playa Vicente (April 1859). 



97. H^MOPHILA RUFESCENS, Sw. ? 



Juquila and Villa Alta (Jan.). 



98. PiPILO MACULATUS, Sw. 



Cinco Senores. 



99. PiPiLO ALBicoLLis, Sclatcr, P. Z. S. 1858, p. 304. 

 Totontepec (Jan.) and Oaxaca. 



100. Chrysomitris mexicana, Sw. 

 Totontepec (Jan.). 



101. Chrysomitris notata, DuBus. 

 Totontepec (Jan. and Feb.). 



102. Carpodacus HjEmorrhous (Wagl.). 

 Oaxaca, many examples, c? et $ . 



Fam. Icterid^. 



103. OSTINOPS MONTEZUMA (LcSS.). 



Playa Vicente. 



104. Cassiculus melanicterus, Bp. Consp. p. 428. — let. me- 

 lanicteriis, Bp. Pr. Ac. Phil. iv. 389. 



(5 et $ , Rio Grande. 



105. Cassiculus prevosti (Less.). 

 Teotalcingo and Playa Vicente. 



106. Icterus spurius, Bp. ? 



Playa Vicente (March), T find much difference in the size of 

 Mexican specimens of these birds, and am inclined to agree with 

 Prof. Baird that I. afiinis is not a really distinct species. 



