441 



5. Calliste cyanotis, Sclater, P. Z. S. 1859, p. 294. 



A specimen in more perfect plumage than the bird which I ori- 

 ginally described from, but unmistakeably recognizable as belonging 

 to the same rare species. Its nearest all}- is certainly Calliste labra- 

 dorides (Mon. of Calliste, pi. ), from which, however, it is easily 

 distinguishable by the black sides of the head and well-defined su- 

 perciliary stripe. 



6. BUARREMON CASTANEICEPS, Sp. IIOV. 



Saturate oleagineus, subtus vix dilutior : remigibus et rectricibas 

 nigricanti-fuscis : pileo castaneo, lateribus capitis cum gida 

 nigricanti-cinereis : rostri nigric anti-plumb ei basi pallida ; 

 pedibus nigris. 

 Long, tota 6 '5, alse 3'1, caudse 2"6. 



But one example of this Buai^remon was in the collection. It 

 may be arranged next to B. rujinuchus and B. latinuchus, from 

 which, however, it is easily distinguished by its general deep olive 

 colouring. 



7. BuARREMON AssiMiLis (Lafr.). 



• Agrees with New Granadian specimens. 



8. GrALLARIA NUCHALIS. sp. nov. 



Saturate hrunnescenti-oleaginea, pileo rvfescentiore, nucha et re- 



gione post-oculari dare castaneis: subtus 7iigricanti~schistacea : 



rostro et pedibus nigris. 



Long, tota 7'5, alse 45, caudse 2*1, rostri a rictu r2 ; tarsi 2"15. 



This bird is a long-legged Grallaria in structure, though in 



plumage it rather resembles the different species of the allied genus 



Formicarius. I have never seen but this one example, now in my 



collection. 



9. PiPREOLA CHLOROLEPIDOTA, Sw. An. in Men. p. 357. 

 This bird agrees so well with Svvainson's description, that I have 



no hesitation in recognizing it as belonging to his species. It is a 

 female of one of the beautiful green Cotingas of the genus Euchlornis 

 or Pyrrhorhynchus, as I had always supposed was likely to be the 

 case *. It is probahly the female of Euchlornis sclateri, Cornalia 

 (Contr. Orn. 1852, p. 133. pi. 4), which is from this same country ; 

 but I am not yet clear upon this point. Its identification is of im- 

 portance, as it proves that the generic name Pipreola should be used 

 for this group, in place of Euchlornis or Pyrrhorhynchus, established 

 many years subsequently. 



* Annals of Natural History, June 1856. 



