PKOBOSCIDIA FROM BALUCHISTAN. 



625 



men) (PI. TV. fig. 6) when the main diflerences appear to be the 

 low ecboloph and general deficiency of cingulum. Probably it is an 

 abnormal tooth. The third specimen (PI. IV". fig. 7 and text- 

 fig. 12) is even more problematic. It is bilophodont, 36 mm. 

 long and 28 mm. broad ; each ridge consists of two cusps joined 



Measurements of specimens, in millimetres. Approximate 

 figures are 'marked with an asterisk. 



Length. 



Breadth. 



BUNOLOPHODON ANGUSTIDENS. 



Lower teeth. 



3id molar. Baluchistan (text-fig. 3 and PL II. fig 1) 



(text-fig. 4) 



„ „ (text-fig. 3), in jaw 



,, ,, damaf^ed specimen . 



'„ Aiivergne. B.M. No. M 5975 



Sansan. B M. No. 40729 



B.M. No. 37242« 



Cambridge Museum (PI. III. fig. 1). 



2nd molar. Baluchistan (text-fig. 2), in jaw 

 Sansan. B.M. No. 42720 .,.., 



B.M. No. 40729 



B.M. No. 37242 a .. 



1st molar. Baluchistan (text-fig. 6) 



Sansan. B.M. No. 40734 



Simorre. B.M. No. 29671 



? India. J^M. No. M 2893 



Upper teeth. 



3rd molar. Baluchistan (PI. I. fig. 1) 



Sansan. B.M. No. 32534 



Chevilly. B.M. No. 7424, a cast 



2nd molar. Baluchistan, older palate .., 



„ younger palate 



'(PI. I. fig. 2) ... 



1st molar. Baluchistan, j-ounger palate 



The width of the palates between the front of the second 

 molar is about 65. 



DiNOTHERIUM Sp. 



Third lower molar 



Length of fragment of lower jaw (text-tigs. 8 



First upper molar 



Second upper molar (text-fig. 10) 



Third upper molar 



143 



162 



158 



143* 



159 



167 



180 



135 



99 

 107 



93 

 105 



78 

 91 

 82 

 71 

 71 



128 

 162 

 1,57 



112 

 79 



77 



56 



365 





64 



52 



63 



62 



70 



66 



64 



67 



65* 



64* 



68 



68 



73 



64 



55 

 63 



61 

 62 



45 

 45 

 49 

 43 



38 



72 

 79 

 78 



57 

 57 

 66 



49 



too'ether transversely. The anterior ridge is thick and somewhat 

 pointed in front, the po.sterior ridge is thin and slightly concave 

 in front, the enamel is smootli and there is no trace of cingulum. 

 It has been compared with all forms of bilophodont teeth in the 



