IIERPETOLOGY OF IlOWER CALIFORNIA. 



113 



The next table shows the same characters of Scelo- 

 ■porus consobrinus :* 



6 







5-a 







Measurements 



in mm. 





7^ 











«*-! 







m 





r^ 



'3 



13 



02 















at 













a 

 





^ 9 



oi 







"3 

 > 

 





a 



a 









Locality. 





M 



02 



I2 

 02 2 



c3 











^• 





0) 



2'^ 



(D 



CC 



5 '^ 





p ■ 





cc 



3 



03 





 02 







'S 



K 







15 



02 



m a 

 ® 





15697 



7 



39 



8 



5 



18 



62 







48 



31 



13 



20 



Prescott, Ariz. 



15696 



? 



39 



9 



4 



15 



58 



86 



44 



28 



12 



18 



" 



15695 



? 



41 



10 



5 



18 



55 



— 



39 



25 



12 



16 



" 



17235 



? 



41 



7 



5 



16 



67 



98 



45 



28 



13 



19 



Tucson, Ariz. 



17234 



3 



38 



8 



5 



17 



54 



91 



43 



28 



12 



18 



" 



16958 



$ 



39 



8 



5 



17 



65 



95 



45 



27 



13 



18 



" 



16959 



$ 



— 



8 



5 



16 



— 



103 



47 



28 



13 



20 



" 



16960 



? 



38 



9 



5 



14 



46 



— 



32 



21 



10 



14 



" 



2895 



s 



— 



9 



5 



14 



48 



62 



30 



20 



10 



12 



Nebraska. 



2895 



5 



40 



8 



4 



14 



63 



80 



37 



26 



13 



15 



" 



2895 



s 



42 



9 



4 



15 



45 



— 



30 



19 



10 



13 



" 



8163 



? 



47 



9 



5 



13 



— 



— 



42 



27 



12 



17 



Utah. 



8163 



6 



43 



9 



4 



13 



61 



— 



43 



28 



12 



18 



" 



8491 



? 



45 



10 



5 



18 



63 



— 



41 



27 



13 



17 



New Mexico. 



8491 



,5 



46 



10 



5 



16 



49 



— 



34 



23 



10 



14 





Comparison. — This species may be easily distinguished 

 from S. consobrinus by its larger scales on the back of 

 the thigh ; from S. biseriatiis by its larger scales on the 

 border of the ear and the back of the thigh; from ,5. 

 orciiiti by its smaller and much rougher dorsals ; and from 

 S . magister and S . zosteronius by its smaller and more 

 sharply mucrpnate scales. It differs from all these in 

 coloration. 



This species is named in honor of Mr. James Lick, 

 who has done so much to foster Science in California. 



* I am greatly indebted to Dr. Leonhard Stejneger for the opportunity 

 to examine these specimens. 



2d Ser., Vol. V. ( 8 ) May 28, 1895. 



