576 



S. O. LINDBERG. 



dock ej ensamma, utan tillsammans med Webe.ra sessilis (Schmid.) 

 LlNDB. '). I första upplagan af Spec. plant. II (1753) upptager 



*) I. WEBERA Ehrh. 



in Hannov. Mag. 1779, 17. Stück, p. 257 et Beitr. I, p. 177 (1787). 



1. W. sessilis (Schhid.). 

 Sphagnum acaulon maximum, foliis in centro ciliaribus Hall. It. helvet. 1739. 



p. 83 c. icon. (1740). Dill. Hist. musc. p. 253, tat. 32, fig. 13 (1741). 

 Phascum acaulon? L. Sp. plant. I. ed., II, p. 1107 (1753). 

 Buxbaumia sessilis Schmid. Diss. de Buxb. p. 26, tab. 2 opt. (1758). Hedw. 



Fundam. II, p. 96 (1782). 

 Phascum subulatum var. ß. Huds. Fl. angl. I. ed., p. 397 (1762). 

 Ph. sp. Müll, in Vet. Akad. Handl. XXV, pp. 28—34, tab. 2, figg 6—12 



(1764). 

 Ph. subulatum Qed. Fl. dan. fasc. V, tab. 249 fig. super. (1766). 

 Bryum Halleri Neck. Method. p. 233 (1771). 

 Phascum maximum Lightf. Fl. scot. II, p. 693 (1777). 

 Ph. monfanum Huds. Fl. angl. IL ed., p. 466 (1778). 

 Ph. Halleri Ketz. Fl. Scand. prodr. II, p. 208 (1779). 

 Buxbaumia foliosa Sw. Method. p. 33, tab. 4, fig. 4 (1781). 

 Webera Diphyscium Ehrh. Beitr. I, p. 189 (1787). 

 Bryum phascoides Jacqu. Collectan. II, p. 220 (1788). 

 Diphyscium foliosum Mohr, Observ. bot. p. 34 (1803). 

 Hymenopogum heterophyllum P.-Beauv. Prodr. p. 60 (1805). 

 Diphyscium sessile Lindb. in Vet. Akad. Förh. XX, p. 393 (1863). 

 Webera sessilis Lindb. in op. cit. p. 394 in obs. (1863). 



Obs. Genus novum suum Weberam janx anno 1779 in op. cit. Ehrhart 

 optime condidit et descripsit. Sed Hedwig, sagacissimuni hunc discipuluni 

 Linn^i contemnens vel negligens, in Fundam. II, p. 95 (1782) noinen anti- 

 quum Ehrharti aliis muscis, Jh-yo pomiformi (Bartramise), Halleri (Bartr.) et 

 trichodi (Bry o nutanti), pessime dedit. In opere S/irp. crypt. I (1787) suas 

 Weberam pyriformem (p. 5, tab. 3) et nu tan t em (p. 9, tab. 4) adumbravit; 

 denique in posthumis suis Spec. musc. (1801) pp. 68 et 69 W, longicollem 

 et has duas reliquit. Quo jure denominationem Ehrharti transmutavit, 

 intelligere tarnen non possumus. Justitia et salute scientiarum flagranter 

 postulantibus nomina antiqua optime condita ut noli längere retineri, deno- 

 minationem Ehrharti in Öfvers. Vet. Akad. Förh. XX, p. 394 in obs. (1863) 

 restituimus et genus illud valde naturale Weberam Hedw., Schimp. in Lam- 

 prophyllum vertimus. 



Ab boc Lamp rophyllo notis sequentibus: foliis in quatuor seriebus per 

 paria dissimilibus dispositis, vix nitidis, atate vinoso-coloratis , remotis, apiculatis, 

 marginatis, nervo brevi, a cellulis maximis, pellucidis, in parte inferiore folii 

 nullo modo, in superiore vix incrassatis, ellipticis (Ep. jamaicensis) vel lanceolatis 

 (Ep. Tozeri), 6 8-gonis, constructis, diversum est ' 



EPIPTERYGIUM Lindb. 

 in Öfvers. Vet. Akad. Förh. XIX, p. 603 (1862). 

 Anisostichium Mitt, in Journ. Proc. Linn. Soc. VII, p. 119 c. icon. (1863 > 



