EEPOET ON THE CEPHALOPODA. 5 



3. Argonauta Mans, Solander. 



1786. Argonauta Mans, Solander, Portl. Catal., p. 44, lat. 1055 (vol. ii. p. 113). * 



1822. „ nitida, Lmk., Anim. s. vert., t. vii. p. 653. 



18E0. ,, Owenii, Ad. and Ev., Voy. " Samarang," Moll, pi. iii. fig. 1. 



1850. „ gondola, Ad. and Ev., Op. cit, pi. ii. 

 1852. ,, Kochiana, Dunker, Zeitschr. f. Malak., p. 49 ( = var.). 

 1861. „ gondola. Reeve, Conch. Icon., pi. iv. figs. 3a, Zh. 



4. Argonauta pacijica, Dall. 



1872. Argonauta padfica, Dall, Amer. Journ. Conch., vol. vii. p. 95. 



5. Argonauta expansa, Dall. 



1873. Argonauta expansa, Dall, Proc. Calif. Acad., N.S., vol. iv. p. 303. 



6. ArgonoMta hcettgeri, Maltzan. 



1881. Argonauta Bostfgeri, Maltzan, Journ. de Conch., t. xxix. p. 163, pi. ix. fig. 7. 



7. Argonauta gracilis, Kirk. 



1885. Argonauta gracilis. Kirk, Trans. N. Zeal. Inst., vol. xvii. p. 58, pi. xiii. 



Ocythoe, Rafinesque, 1814 {non Leach et auctt.). 

 Parasira, Steenstrup. 



1. Ocythoe tuherculata, Eafinesque."'' 



1814. Ocythoe tuherculata, Eaf., Pr&is decouv. somiol., p. 29. 



1828. Octopus catenulatus, F&'., C^ph. acet.; Poulpes, pi. vi. his et ter. 



1837. „ Carence, Y^r., Mem. Accad. Sci. Torino, ser. 2, t. i. p. 92, pi. ii. 



1838. Philonexis tuhereidatus, d'Orb., C^ph. acet., p. 87 ; Poulpes, pi. vi. Us et ter, pi. xxiii. 

 1840. Ocythoe tuhei-culata, Eaf., Good Boole, p. 63. 



1849. Philonexis Alcceus (?), Gray, B.M.C., p. 26. 



1851. Octopus ccdemdcdus, Y&v., Ceph. m^dit., p. 37, pi. xiii. 



1851. „ Carena, V&, Ceph. m6dit., p. 34, pi. xiv. figs. 2, 3 ; pi. xlL figs. 1, 2. 

 1861. Parasira catemdutct, Stp., Vid. Meddel. nat. Foren. Kj0benhavn, Aar 1860, p. 333. 

 1869. „ „ Targ., Cef. Mus. Pirenze, p. 11. 



1869. „ tuherculata, Targ., Op. cit., p. 13. 



1880. Ocythoe tuherculata, Stp., Ommat. Blsekspr., p. 104. 



1881. Parasira catenidata, Vll., Ceph. N. E. Amer., p. 362, pi. xxxiii. fig. 2. 



1 I have not had an opportunity of seeing the Portland Catalogue hut the references in hrackets are taken from a 

 copy of Solander's MS. in the Linnean Society's Library, for the knowledge of which I am indebted to Dr. Murie ; it 

 was written by Humphreys and was formerly in the possession of G. B. Sowerby, from whom it was purchased for the 

 sum of £b. 



2 It seems very improbable that this is the Octojms tuhereidatus of Risso (Hist. Nat. Eur. Merid., t. iv. p. 3, 1826); 

 his description does not seem to me applicable to this form, in addition to which we have Verany's statement (C^ph. 

 medit., p. 40) that Risso did not recognise the drawing of Octopus catemdatus {oj). cit., pi. xiii.) as his species. There 

 can, however, be no doubt that, as Steenstrup has recently pointed out {loc. cit.), this is the species which Rafinesque 

 had in view in constituting the genus Ocythoe, which Leach and others have always understood to be the animal of the 

 Argonaut, which Rafinesque clearly states was not the case (Good Book, loc. cit). 



