DUNN—LABIATAE. 171 
before publishing the above species. Both his localities for 
T. Pernyt are given on Franchet’s authority, and the note ‘‘ Herb. 
Kew’”’ was probably inadvertant. It is certainly not now in 
the Herbarium. The type now borrowed from Paris agrees 
. exactly with Hemsley’s species. It will be observed with regard 
to the flowers of this genus that the relative position of the side 
lobes to the lower lobe of the corolla changes in some species 
during the period between the opening and withering. The 
upper, middle and trifid lower lobes are in these cases at first 
analogous, but later by the drawing forward of the middle or 
side lobes the appearance is produced of a bilabiate corolla with 
a pinnatifid lower lobe. 
T. Franchetianum, Diels in Engl. Jahrb. xxix (1g0I), 551. 
Type in Christiania Herb.=T. ornatum, Hemsl. 
T. fulvo-aureum, Léveillé in Fedde, Repert. Nov. Sp. viii 
(1910), 426. Typein Le Mans Herb.=T. guadrifarium, Buch.- 
Ham 
re kouyichense, Léveillé 1.c. 450. Type in Le Mans Herb.= 
T. guadrifarium, Buch.-Ham 
T. nepetoides, Léveillé te. 450. Type in Le Mans Herb.= 
T. japonicum, Willd. 
T. ningpoense, Hemsl. in Journ. Linn. Soc. xxvi (1890), 313. 
Type in Kew Herb.=T. Pernyi, Franch. 
Leucoscepirum Bodinieri, Léveillé in Fedde, Repert. Nov. 
Sp. ix, 224=L. sinense, Hems 
Ajuga Chaneti, Léveillé et Vaniot in Fedde, Repert. Nov. Sp. 
viii (1910), 258=A. ciliata, Bunge. 
A. Labordei, Vaniot in Bull. Acad. Géogr. Bot. xiv (1904), 
185=A. genevensis, Linn. 
