LIST OF FIGURES (continued) 



Page 



Figure 3-4. Depth difference plot of the July 1996 survey versus the July 1992 

 survey over the southwestern quadrant of WLIS, 0.25 m contour 

 interv^al 20 



Figure 3-5. Bathymetric chan of the July 1996, 400 m x 400 m analysis area 



around the H mound, 0.25 m contour interv^al 22 



Figure 3-6. Bathymetric chart of the July 1992, 400 m x 400 m analysis area 



aroimd the H moimd, 0.25 m contour interval 23 



Figure 3-7. Depth difference plot of the 400 m x 400 m analysis area, July 1996 



versus July 1992, 0.25 m contour interv'al 24 



Figure 3-8. Bathymetric chart of the 400 m x 400 m analysis area overlaid with 

 footprint of fresh dredged material detected by depth difference (see 

 Figure 3-8) and dredged material thickness 27 



Figure 3-9. REMOTS® photographs at Stations 50W and lOOW comparing the 

 level of oxidation (RPD depth) in the surface over the WLIS H 

 mound 28 



Figure 3-10. Distribution of successional stage assemblages over the WLIS H 



mound, overlaid on July 1996 bathymetry and final detectable margin 



of the mound 29 



Figure 3-11. Bathymetric chart of the July 1996, 700 m x 700 m analysis area 



around the G mound, 0.25 m contour interval 30 



Figure 3-12. Bathymetric chart of the July 1992, 700 m x 700 m analysis area 



around the G mound, 0.25 m contour interval 32 



Figure 3-13. Depth difference plot of the 700 m x 700 m analysis area, July 1996 



versus July 1992, 0.25 m contour interval 33 



Figure 3-14. Distribution of RPD and OSI values over the WLIS G mound, 



overlaid on July 1996 bathymetry' and fmal detectable margin of the 



mound (see Figure 3-13) 35 



