LIST OF FIGURES (continued) 



Page 



Figure 3-6. Bathymetric chart of the 600 m x 600 m analysis area overlaid with 

 footprint of fresh dredged material detected by depth difference 

 calculations (see Figure 3-4) as well as replicate-averaged RPD and 

 OSI values from 1996 REMOTS® survey 22 



Figure 3-7. REMOTS® photographs collected over Stations 300W and CTR of the 

 CLIS 95 mound providing examples of Stage I benthic recolonization 

 stams versus Stage III 24 



Figure 3-8. Bathymetric chart of the 1000 m x 1000 m analysis area over the 



CLIS 94 mound, July 1996, 0.25 m contour interval 25 



Figure 3-9. Bathymetric chart of the 1000 m x 1000 m analysis area over the 



CLIS 94 mound, September 1995, 0.25 m contour interval 26 



Figure 3-10. Bathymetric chart showing pockets of apparent consolidation over the 



CLIS 94 mound since September 1995, 0.25 m contour interval 27 



Figure 3-11. Bathymetric chart of the 1000 m x 1000 m analysis area over the 



CLIS 94 mound, July 1994 baseline, 0.25 m contour interval 28 



Figure 3-12. Depth difference plot of the July 1996 data vs. the July 1994 data 

 showing the current status of the CLIS 94 mound, 0.25 m contour 

 interval 29 



Figure 3-13. Bathymetric chart of the 1000 m x 1000 m analysis area overlaid with 

 footprint of detectable dredged material (see Figure 3-12) as well as 

 replicate-averaged RPD and OSI values from 1996 REMOTS® survey 31 



Figure 3-14. REMOTS® photographs at Stations CTR and lOOE comparing the 



level of oxidation (RPD depth) in the surface sediments over the CLIS 



94 mound 32 



Figure 3-15. Bathymetric chart of the 1600 m x 1600 m analysis area over the 



NHAV 93 mound, July 1996, 0.25 m contour interval 33 



