LIST OF FIGURES (continued) 



Page 

 Figure 4-24. REMOTS® photographs collected at Stations 100 W and 200 SW as 

 part of the January 1997 CDM survey showing the distinct coarse- 

 grained sand over pseudo-UDM 95 



Figure 4-25. REMOTS® photographs collected at Stations 50 N and 50 SW as part 

 of the January 1997 CDM survey showing the composition of the 

 finer-grained CDM detected at several stations 96 



Figure 4-26. REMOTS® photographs collected at Stations CTR and 50 N as part of 

 the January 1997 CDM survey showing evidence of the estuarine 

 origin and biologic activity in the dredged material 98 



Figure 4-27. Depth difference plot showing detectable capped mound deposit 



(NAD 27) complete with gravity coring station locations 99 



Figure 4-28. Histogram of the mean mineralogy composition of the UDM survey 



grab samples and the PDS core, CDM, UDM and ambient layers 104 



Figure 4-29. Histograms of mean relative abundance and density of micro fossils in 

 the sediment samples analyzed as part of the Royal River Capping 

 Demonstration Project 106 



Figure 4-30. Histograms of mineralogical composition of the three additional Royal 



River cores 108 



Figure 4-31 . Histograms of relative abundance of micro fossils and the numbers of 

 individuals counted for the given number of trays analyzed for 

 additional Royal River cores 110 



Figure 4-32. A. Dendrogram of hierarchical agglomerate clustering using Bray- 

 Curtis similarity index of micro fossil data from PDS cores 114 



Figure 4-33. A. Dendrogram of hierarchical agglomerate clustering using Bray- 

 Curtis similarity index of mineralogy data from PDS cores 115 



Figure 4-34. Plots of mineralogy and microfossil discriminant scores showing 



distinct clusters of samples according to layers in PDS cores 118 



Figure 5-1 Thickness of pseudo-UDM measured by REMOTS and core data 



overlaid on a postcap bathymetric chart (NAD 27) 121 



