r e . gs E 1 Z al eri pin gine tien wit pte oe 
pene; butt nothing further 
1 
„ 
erops the evi 
of C 
2—1850.] 
amond, oe Or Nin e of the aboy and Hoy s Cru- 
t 
2 Wo 2 Cottage, Isleworth. 
„ Bien Mamet eR AO 
ITC CHELL’S ROYAL ALBERT RHUBARB 
ing wines, 
mage ge gh oe i 
an inestimable arer ey 
M. 
ary p 
Lea | one-year planted 1 * 18. 6d. 
6d.; and Vic The 
usual allowance to the Post-o ‘offic ce o 5 stan ashe ane 
to WILLIAM MITCHELL, Enfield Highway, Middlesex, T meet 
with prompt attention. N. B. The above oP o fi 
‘weeks earlier than the well-known Victo 
LINNÆUS RHUBARB. 
MYATT aan $ SONS can confidently — nd 
variety as the best in cultivation. The most satis- 
arb m 
Tei is perae e B 38 and about a fortnight earlier 
an the Victoria; added to — — is held in general estee 
for preserving and all culin urposes. One-year plan — 
roots, 18. 6d, ; ditto, Mitchell's s Royal 2 ls. 6d.; Victoria, 
9d. The usual Trade allow t-office orders are re- 
quested to be made payable * a . — Manor Farm 
De ptford.—Jau. 12. 
CLERODENDRON a ie Se NUM, 
UGH LOW anp Co. have m 
orneo, and is figured — described 
of ry Botantal 
atalo pee 
3 
M Stro 
1 general 122 stamped, and free by 7 also 
list of Vegetable and Flower — 8 — best pte 
most — varieties, may be had on applicat 
Clapton Nursery, London, Jan. 
The 5 Chronicle. 
SATURDAY, JANUARY 12, 1850. 
MEETINGS FOR THE ENSUING WEEK. 
1 
Monpay, Jan. 
Toxspar, — 
WEDNESDAY, —= 
SATURDAY, — 10 oval T r. x. 
J Westminster Medical . . = 
We have received from the oan ip ag SEwac 
Manure Company the report m y the di rectors 
at a late es meeting of the oe 
‘The conclusions a po vaes the directors have sh 
— ounde . vely upon horticu 
bject is Aut brought directly within 
8 
8.8.5 
e 8 some of the eng pro- 
duced upon the occasion referred to, such for 
example as the estimate of a an gain ‘of "froma 18 
10 23 per cent., after the completion of the works, 
which appears rs to us to be who: olly fallacio 
m sewage on their oe — = 
THE GARDENERS’ 
. | vompany 
- | that did not belong to lig cs 
point of view a 5 — aer 
which the wasted, must be put aside 
CHRONICLE. 19 
that the “ sewer water, 1 spoken of in the re 
of lucrative 
befo ore us is worth s : much as 
report e small nu 
the advocates of. Salinas of horticulture 
alaries received 
and yet this is the only test of tha e 
attending 25 n All other statements are 
t. en a man says that his 
sation, in consequence of the use of a 
id if boys 
not usually allowed wages fully equal to the value 
of their laboiir an head gardeners were so comfo 
ably pro vided for as not to need some assistance of this 
crops are 
and I sold the crop on # for 2/. an 
the crop on m, then we know that it is worth while during so many of his earlier years, has 
to pay 30s. or 40s. 1 the use of z. No such infor- nH. 2 these i i 
mation is to be fou .| the 
But there is aati question. Do the reports will ultimately oe them in a 
now produced, such as they are, represent truly the | Knowledge not only gives power to its 
effect of using liquid manure ? e think not. sessor, but it also supplies him with 3 if 
They appear to represent little more than the effect | rightl adiest way i 
ing i his 
of irrigation. 
applied, would probably eiia 
good. The market — 
trifling aap, that t 
produced results as both justifiable and laudable. 
i all the profit ee from such a source 
no offensive sist philant 2 ropie than commenda 
e aa “application ; and en —— 
is is ae enoug some 
wka w — content — a disgrace t sihn but it is 
drank the sewer water i: came from gru true of all, nor of and it is preposterous 
it 
's mains, wi witho ut pereeving . quality 
It m 
be doubted whether the Com 
to avoid over-strong debe, 
advantageous, have not followed the ore d of a 
homceopathists, and been n supplying their customers were shared amongst the different foremen of the 
. infinitesimal doses i i 
this 188 
any, in 1 a their a 0 of life. 
ich 
E 4 
as one which represents the effects of hi 5 least, that the 2 gardener might offer a re- 
in a light less favourable than it des ward to those in whose department the penne 
can be no bon —— spat the liquid daa Soh fin — arike made the greate This is a 
Lo exercise a far more striking | point on which we do not feel called upon to offer 
anything here testified to, a 
h 
8 
anyon 
arrangem 
o, with a ye og — that strongly inclines many 
wn 4 a ie obtain leave to to oppose p they are sometimes 
r and ate 
o call together competent and unbiassed judges, i in m a gent 
A the public places e 8 Who shall H 3 prt t arising fr m his gardeners skill in 
examine and reget upon the ra result in a business- teaching. S K rer: us to 
like way. It is a very great question for London, | a gardener K Re previous toils, and for the com- 
and vy en ought po: = 1 without further | munication of their results to the young men plac 
— time. In fac is is done, all con- | under his 22 rge. 2 as for premiums exacted from 
8 of the vari me se gon which have been | journe them 
rop for drain Ks London is premature 
don wor ving, i 
under F 
Is the —— for — veme: 
sewage water of Lon upon 
g, in a pecuniary | indefensible any principle whatever. 
— We think, too, that other reasons may be given 
question. If it c e to apply it p in favour of apprentice fees; they tend to 
crops, and the . is ee by 40s., ‘h 
seems clear that . plan for PAER London, in 
On the f 8 the reverse 5 prove to be 
the fact, the best plan will then be the eee 
gets rid of it i in the qui ee e — 
Towards the 5 of this 9 8 
seems to have been made. It 
on e W 
factory. Th ral result of is admitted on at sewage water is 
follo ts : A eee = experience is as aluable; but nobody has satisfactorily er what 
1. Growth is more rapid and healthy after the the real relation is between crop and cost, so far dif 
3 of “ sewer water.” (Bransgrove, Miller, 
G. an . Bagley, Crouch.) 
2. es in size; but its effect on 
not been observed, 
Bagley, M: iller.) 
3. The yield of Raspberry bushes is much im- 
observed, 8 .) 
grove, Broadbent 
WB agley, Crouch, Miller. „ 
5. No 3 odour. U the witnesses except 
Bransgrove, who found a “ very little. ee” 
o any sag ph price ob | for the 
idence is — except in 
case arrots, 
general statements the report proceeds 
to particulars, and 3 vidence is brought for- 
ward in proof of the advantage 25 “ sewer water 
ent. S are not very encouraging ; 
may therefore be regarded as the more trustw 
We cannot, however, draw from them the inference 
| tare other classes 
and inally, the gardener himself is thus 5 
orthy. both sides of the estion, and en and endeavour rm ‘toad wa a higher rank in the sage ofthe rst of the pies 8 
the reader to a ie, gue = 
as the metropolis is concerned. 
A QUESTION has arisen as to whether Gardeners 
their i 
r 
of “e rs. V hat 
specious reason can ther sp centers should 
be deprived of that reward of . e and skill | tio 
severity, ` 
these eae er 
s discovered | that his pr rofession is 
