ee ae ee 
a 
$ 
i 
0 
29—1850. | 
THE AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE. 
457 
ä — — ę— — 
CORN MANURE FOR 1. BARLEY, 
HE pre atta MANURE COMPANY most con- 
Ae dai the above, as they are daily receiving | 0 
used it with great 
i Ay from arties who 
bts a be. f. Found fully equal to and much 
success t will be 
preg Peruvian Guano, and is not so liable to produce 
so large a gro a rri Price Seven Guineas per ton, 3 cwt. 
acre, They also beg to offer their Concentr: ated Urate, 
Buperphos phate Ware Nitrate of Soda, Sulphate and | Phosphate 
of Amm ammonia, Fishe ior and other Salt, Gy psum i Saites c Acid, 
and e Peruvian Guano, To in mi 5 5 
a ail I purchasers can receive it dred #6 m the Ware. 
houses of the Im 
— EDWARD PURSER, Secretary. 
n Dealers and Agents supplied. 
ANURES.— The following Manures are manu- 
M factured at lg aml- mde pho eni Deptford et 
do a 
Corn and Grass 0 0 
—— Manure, — s 
Turnip Man aie ove e 
I l 0 0 
Sulphuri coer 2 pole 00 
0 — Gity, shane: 
N. B. Peru 20 o, guaranteed to contain 16 per — of 
Ammonia, 9. 15s. por — and for 5 z or more, 91. 10s. per 
ton, in dock. Sulphate of Ammonia, 
ERUVIAN GUANO.—As Agents of the Peruvian 
and e 
Government for the importation and sale of "E — | 
MA 3 we think it right, — the protection of 
table dealers 
= 
or to dea 
ho 8 and ont — J ‘they 
—— ai sonene er 
nd more “mars — — choicest Marbles, is less than 
and is s PATRONISED by her 
Clergy, 5 
Con rs, and 
rniture, Candelabra, 
Stones, Mural gag Pilasters, Plinths, Fonts, 
Gran ases, Balus — no 15 e to represent 
—— a t all “the more tnd 
atella, Bresci 
ieces, from 25s. meinen Eve Aes sent on n i tò 
r. Macnus, PIxIL. TOO SLATE Works, 39 and 40, Upper Belgrave- 
piste London. 
* — and Plain Slate N of all descriptions, at low 
LIGHT, CHEAP, AND DURABLE ROOFING. 
ROGGON’S PATENT ASPHALTE ROOFING 
2 
2 
m 
o 
8 
S 
© 
22 
E 
on 
* 
4 
8 
g 
zÈ 
> 
g] 
kS 
2 
5 
id 
on with great facility by, farm servants, or . — 
Price 1d. per square 
— PATENT NON-CONDUCTING FELT, for 
d Pipes, saves = — cent. of fue 
— s and Testimonials sent by post, on application to 
CrocGcon and 0 Co., 2, Dowg ate-hill, London. 
Che Agricultural Gazette. 
TURDAY, JULY 20, 
MEETING FOR THE FOLLOWING WEEK. 
Taunspar, July 25—Agricultural Imp. Society of Ireland. 
A creat amount of hard writing, an 
prise 
orzi TA Mey mportant par 
sided fo erest, have oe hitherto Tete d 
the When Aten from the pens of those who 
so freely bestow their wisdom upon Poh tenant and s 
e We mean the land agen 
and almost sole idea eat occupied the 
nd o have be t 
to the details, let tim an least show 
his property by visits, not like angels’ . few and far s 
between.“ ant 
become the cust r 
e the entire management of hiit estates. 
first objection we make against the prevailing system 
tefers to the terms of this contract, the usual scale of 
se them that aed “adulteration app 
ed, 
8- | mistake ¢ 
| toa of & 
OATS, BEANS, / remuneration being a per centage upon the revenue, 
thus giving the agent a premium not upon the value 
any means whatever be — 1 —.— out of it. 
this all; under such a system i 
is a very 
prevalent one), can we wonder that there is so fieh 
ings. 
acquainted with the value of land ; 
a profit from every legal transaction conneċted with 
the estate, what a fruitful source of liti igation, 
seizures, 3 n, and miseri very kind! 
Nor do 9001 a 577 to the system of paying 
o the * awyer land- agent, but 
other individuals 
ership ; h f domestic chaplains, 
ven of worn-out butlers who have been raised to 
this responsible An advertisement which lately | ; 
mana 8 
was in reduced circumstances. e hoped s 
a recomm mendation would have weight speaks cleatly 
n the amount 5 can by 
Nor is | to be 1 8 ed, we will me 
tate, Nev 
$ pie — before. 
are covered with gay 
ost ev 
present state of agriculture must N be 
traced. 
8 
E 
o 
E 
er 
* 
2 
m 
land undrained, and so many rui in a business, as ae of transacting it with 
Our second objection to the general system re- of the numbers —— connected with a 
fers to the person to wh s are entrusted, ne ea estate. He are re- 
namely, a lawyer, who from his profession can have | qu uired to give their undivided attention, and are > paid 
had no opportunity of making himself thoroughly accordingly. When any tenant feels lf 
and as he derives his the farm being offered 
t has 
as this Ran Node 
er has en accepted, and 
ririn a parallel, ‘there 
the 
v 
o has not even this year been one farm offered to 
public. 
Tue citizens of Exeter eray have most success- 
m ree themselves to do honour to the meet- 
aa Society during the past week. 
2 ty so decked out with and 
e 
the place has been ve 
enough as 
But there i is in ETR cases a 3 1 pelt ar 
mitted. It is no ommon 
to — — 
one a ha a great num 
take each one at a lower price than a person could | 
| afford to devote the whole of his time bed it for. W 
20007. per 
ow O estate w annum, which 
by this system cost the owner only per annum 
$ ent. ! 1 pas h 
e 
gon of cattle nor hae ee has 8 n so E 
e have known it: but this has 
nother 
FF bin NS a INSURANCE, 
Ir is somewhat ch see publicly 8 so 
many er ror of po as the directors of our 
l us ta they! have pore for dead N 
at these 
rance companies 
b 
e | very fine, on the question occurs, from what source 
Are the directors 2 
under sen 
mii is diminishing, the land anarie yer il 
woes _ Lando 
and judgmen 
confidence on ae ve be 
gentleman who prefaced his instructions to 
his agen scr with the bid: sentence“ In the 
first ee remember and is 
ch ! 
style of men he mus 
o those landown 
are t to act upon the hort aighted 1 of 0 
den ws and no 
very 
g e 
land, they are — — tely still rarer, 
re the — er having found such an agent, 
— his abiliti ties. 
n for land that land- 
ing the full 
auction—a most foolish aioe and when we con 
sider that the owner has at least a life interest in 
the estate, and the bidders at such an auction only 
a yearly one—which s the most likely to 
. by over cropping to sak up an extravagan 
ent? 
That the landowners themselves are the parties 
most to blame i much of the — — that 
be admitted, but at the same time we 
pay as ae have “ign ES spe to, at much of the 
wners have re to Jean 
di 
a 
r prone 
fas — * oe sake of 
pay Value lost, &c. 
pe which is Nea 
ons, N the farmers Jerid 4 * 
mon Premisi * this e the 
examine whether this vag is likely to be a e 
investment for the farm ash. 
The average amount ‘of ‘premium payable for the 
different classes of animals insured, including districts 
w nia has visited 
- of the system upon which his estates must have 51, which is bon the sum really 
been manage ed. insured — then the premium is rather above 5} 
ly the int of a landowner to give | per t. There are also a few items whi 
very encouragement and sca to his a 908 heavily on the insured: there is, first, 10 per cent. to 
ha ad we not often seen the very opposite opin Cae ed ‘ot quart oe on all young 
ted upon, we must have ee for alluding to x 5 3 api iA Hee sl 
such. 8 net 3 t fact. 8 vi vage claimed by the 
o-pneum 
ompany—a wert gT should sy — aera ranging vad 105.3 
to per , the 
mr 
6 to 30 — Arg Ta, and 
—say 100 pays 
aces woof the Frag 
that die do so of the 
| farmer insures tirks, from 
| ine 51. sterling value—sa 
ving T 
sider the proportion of d 
mia what with s setoning, plenty of Turnips, 
, &c., not man ts die. However, 
— that 10 per cent. . & let us see the farmer's 
e sheet at the close of the year of insurance, &.: 
— 2 lance- Sheet, „ 20 Stirks, £c. 
Premium £5 0 A pede yg of 
ye — — two ow ETIO 6 
ov 10. R. 
‘inte est 
one ne years i > oe 5 0 Deduct 10 per 
— — cent, „ 2 9 O-2 5 8 
„ 5 0 = on — 
agen paid by in oney paid by in- 
com’ 5 5 0 surance compan 
pany 5 5 0 Net balance &c. 3 ed 
ie — lost to 
0 0 
To mih much for the i sarees of young stock; 
5 5 0 
10 0 0 
5 0 
£15 
and sure 
nt I am the voice would be still less favourable for in- 
full grown n ordinary 
surance as animals. 
| anne 1 do not think era 5 per — of these 
of eattle indi- 
So 
exists for the proper 
