BIHANG TILL K. SV. VET.-AKAD. HANDL. BAND 8. N:0 9. 



7 



When referring however 



gian, 



Blunienhachium Kontg 1824. Ico- 

 nes fossilnm Sectilea. Cent, prim., p. 3, 

 tab. V, f. 69. Long believed to be a 

 Heliolitid, but the singular structure 

 should be due to the effloresceuse of 

 some inherent salt according to Salter 

 in the 4th Ed. of Siluria, Explanation of 

 plates D'ORBrcKT placed it amongst the 

 Heliolitidas, as well as Lonsdale in 

 Sil. Svst. 680. 



to the figures of Konig it seems to be 



evident that he thereby meant the Spon- 



noAv known as Stellispongia, 



Bolboporites Pander 1830. Beitr. zur 

 Geognosie Russlands, 106. There can 

 be no doubt left that the fossils com- 

 moalv named thus are neither corals nor 



* 



bryozoa, but, as is evidently shown by 

 their intimate structure, parts of the ske- 

 leton of some Echinodermatous animal, 

 possibly some unknown starfish, amongst 

 the recent ones of Avhich blunt, loosely 

 affixed spines of nearly the same appea- 

 rance often occur. Of course also a few 

 real corals of the order of the Favoai- 

 tidx have been referred to this genus. 



EothrophyUum Trautschold 1879. 

 Nouv. Mem. Nat. Moscon XIV in the 

 paper on »Die Kalkl)ruche von Miatsch- 

 kowa» p. 30. Seems in no important 

 character to deviate from Cyatbophyllum. 



Buccula EicHWALD 1860. Lethaea 

 rosaica T, 516. The two species which 

 compose this genns differ in the chief 

 point, viz. that one has a coenenchyma 

 and that the other wants it. B. paral- 

 lela may perhaps be a coral, but is too 

 badly preserved, B. pertusa is a bryozoan. 



Calamopo7'a GoLDF 1826 — 33- Petref. 

 Germanift I, 77. Contains species of 

 Favosites but also bryozoans of the 

 genus »Millepora». 



Calapoecia Billings 1865. Canad. 

 Geol. &c Nat. 2d Ser. II, 425. Syno- 

 nyms to this genns are Coluranopora 

 XiCHor.s., Houghtonia Rominger and 

 l)robahly also Lyopora NicH, & Ethkk. 

 Type: C, anticostietisis. S, 



Calceola Lamarck 1799. Prodrome 

 d'nne nouvelle classification dcs Coquilles 

 in »Meraoires de la Soc. d'Histoire Nat. 

 de Paris" p. 89. D. Contains only a 

 single species, C sandalina. 



Calopliyllum Dana 1846. Sillim. Journ. 

 183. According to M, Edwards = Am- 



plexus and to Mokhis — Pylocoelia. 



Calostylis Lindstrom 1868. Ofvers. 

 Vet. Ak. Forhandl. 421. Type C. den- 



ticnlata. S. 



Campophyllum E. H. 1850. Br. Fosa. 



Cor. Ixviii. It is very difficult to di- 





stinguish this genns from Amplexus or 



Cyatbophyllum. S. 



Campsnctis Rafinesuue & CLirroRD 

 1820. Ann. So. Physiques. V, 234. By 

 the incomplete descriptions it is impog- 

 sible to state precisely what is meant 

 by this genus. A. Agassiz in ScuD- 

 DERs Nomencl. identifies it with Cyatho- 

 phyllum. 



Coninia MiCHEMN 1841. Atti della 

 riunione degli Scienziati italiani in To- 

 rino 18i0, 228. Is generaly considered 

 to be identical with Zaphrentis, but the 

 description given might as well apply to 

 Amplexus. 



Cannapora Hall 1852, Pal. of N. 

 York TI, 43. Nearly allied to Syringo- 

 pora, but having the connecting tubes 

 at the same level. S. 



Carcinophyllum Nicholson & J. 

 Thomson 1876. Ann. Mag. N, H. 4th 

 Ser. vol. 18, p. 70—71. — Proc. Phil. 

 Soc. Glasgow, vol. XII, p. 241. C. 



Cnryophyllia Lamk. 1816. An. s. vert. 

 II. 224. The genus of L. only em- 

 braces a single fossil. The species which 

 are by Hisingeb referred to this genns 

 are either Acervulariae or Ptychophylla. 

 According to de Koninck species of Li- 

 thodendron have been included in it. 



Catenaria KoNiG 1824. Icones, pi. 

 XIII, fig. 151, — Halygites. 



Catenipora La3Ix. 1816, Anim s. vert, 

 II, 206. = Halysites, 



Cennphyilnm see Kenophyllum. 

 Cevtrephyllum J. Thomson 1880. Proc. 



Phil. Soc. Glasgow, XII, 227. =? Clisio- 

 phyllum. 



C e n t r p h y 11 u m Vzrneuil. This 

 name is annotated as given to a Coral 

 from Spain, but I cannot find the refe- 

 rence, 



i 



Ceratophyllum Eaton 1832 accor- 

 ding to L. Agassiz Nomenclator. Is not 

 mentioned by any sabseqaent American 

 author. The genns has probably first 

 been described in E's Textbook of Geo- 

 logy. 



Ceriaster Lindstr. 1883 in Ricjit- 

 hofen's China IV, 61. S. 



Chmtetes Fischer von Waldheim 1830 



—37. Oryctogr. dn Gouv. de Moacoo, 

 159. Some species of Favosites have 

 been numbered amongst this genns, ench 

 for instance having very fine calicles as 

 in Hall. Illnstr, Devon. Fossi!s pi. 

 37. f. 16—17. 



Chocaxis M. Edw. H. 1851. PoL 

 Fobs. Terr, pal., 173. C. 



Clionopflyllam Edw. H. 1850. Brit, 

 Foss. Cor. Ixix. Synonymous i% Cono- 



