THE GARDENERS CHRONICLE AND AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE. ГЁбишблйҮ 29, 100! 
20{ 
rt, finding а verdict for the the 
y Rogers of the moving an chor T bel etos | эе о + 
“ M à date of Messrs. meee | between Mr. Fowler and Messrs. oward for the use | plaintiffs on a e issu 
after each bout ua. © : attained by the aid ота a|of his „patenta, had be en broke n off, William Fiskin | Mr. ‚ Hindmarsh asked his eid to name а sum, 
anua ial labour, wlich had the | had written tha 
ex-| invented the balancing power, and in addition to ta: | His lordship io 40s. with the usual 
he s кт jum PM ту pecia х Messrs. Fiskin had offered to ud them a license to | would be suffici Certificates 
i eeded in establishing that fact the | he verdies lingly 
e j in law the 
towards perfection. They placed a set o plonghe Беи. ha-a де М h NT еч ende lode Home Correspondence : 
i i . Rogers, Your 7 
н туннар н ае ie is gota vr. epit яе дЫ of the machine patented, in replying to Mr. Wilkins on this subjeet, "чыр 
were оозе namely, moving anchor. € т: Es ата Morris alleges that h 
By | provin ел on that ground also the patent wo sparrow its young wi 
аы ETE A oe shaft fi the plo ploughran за Б £ alid. : Mr. Morris simply quotes the experience of Mr, Ji 
8 Wm. Fiskin, who appeared t u Hawley, of rccte in the passage printed by your 
land, and as they were lifted the Set | was called, and Ез letter кысуы эе ы m to Messrs. n i 
end were depresse ed ino. the | Howards, in which he claim 
i : 
c 
= 
Ф 
4 
© 
A 
=a 
© 
E 
о 
Е 
БЕ? 
= 
c 
Ф 
e 
E 
Ф 
et 
© 
ч 
E 
© 
2 
Ф 
m 
Ф 
«4 
E 
е 
к? 
n Smk wo rev.. gentlemen,” are not therefore at 5E, 
out of t 
is point. The Rev. G. "er o ооа is top 
g 
2 
[=] 
2 
А 
8 
et 
= 
o 
во 
et 
E 
© 
© 
© 
о 
го 
= 
© 
e.c 
Е 
о 
о 
е, 
S 
Е Ф 
B5 
© 
ce 
[22 
Е 
Ф 
ш 
Ф 
< 
[c] 
+ 
о 
тш” 
О 
go 
LL 
к 
© 
а 
= 
= 
e 
[7] 
eem 
EN 
2 
er 
2 
© 
$ 
ч 
t 
а 
» 
5 
H 
balaneing power, was put into ре Pee s 
i i other 
that T че letter "и зз е en de E^ usui? Ub tbe анон does id AE Й 
in ng 
followi К 
patent d farther oae riga Mr. Fowleradopted | tained that the idea of the balancing pow bm Bii ' 
ihe balancing power, which formed a great гант in| suggested itself to them before it had mi кд itself og std r Ano a e ita та Wee ае 
Ша machine oh Moss vg. pni ma ad Күр viag | Los eaterpillars, and so great is the number of Dee 
zie Roge ted 
Er qae PERE OE s 3M i Thomas Fiskin brought hima Che model of а stem | broode of young thi It e a question when 
ihe action of draught power. The action, in point of plough shortly озн the agricultural il vd Carlisle | benefit thus performed is not a fair equivalent ше 
MEAS D д нт. # |1п 1855. Mr. Fiskin was introduced + y Mr. | grain and bv required at other periods оё - 
ct, was very similar to that exhibited by two chil year, 
dEM unc i uae cde b ОТ loughs were placed Fowler, an engineer of Stockton qa Te patent); In | Vol. i., page 476. Buffo n salas that the 
ME ык and wben one set was s pulled down by the ыдан S del, Mr. Fisk in dt sed to МАЗ ork the destroys eaterpillars by. thousands, The "Rer. J. б. P 
x 1 GU тег Wood, in his recent work o Mee History, alleges 
y id the i 
patents were assigne ed to the plaintiffs. 1 Fiski Wd ndun ey 
= 5 s of doing во; and he then inane | order ed b Gove rnmení, an th consequence үг 
Mia Nonsome. A Ашар: Clayton. & Shutie | that Y should pay him kis account for constructin x e "ай ш 
т : the machine, and he 474. а J his * e 
rangement by which they should be authorised | '. gne is | Dy cater priam " page (еласа їп eade 
to use both Fiskins' and Fowlers’ patents in the con- | protection. 7. They ы: x 307. off a bill of 377, | PN History, E 
struction of steam ploughs, on the payment by each | he took out a pro nal. protection, making the de estroys de осебе of caterpillars” durin ng the breed. 
А fpes У бы, | drawing and араай; in the name of Messrs ing season; an ally, Mr. Edw; Ee of a 
Tul Another agreement was then entered into by ls inm. Lincolnshire; quoted by M. Morris, 
red "їп the аб of pisi 
Е - ЕЛЕ Fis kin go ch кы be assigned to him, he paying | sparrows, The question, theref. 
he said, “ Upon canvassing the subject with my brother , sp question, e vi is not so plain to- 
I found фа he has ms ШНЕК СБа to mr royalty upon allthe machines he constru тобой | every tyro of a naturalist.” It is probable that te 
carrying the agreement further, that if the agreement | ?* TRE received 601. to give up his interest in the | sparrow will refuse to touch hairy ыл but. 
m d out d [o m ha E E NM of E patent. After the provisional protection had been even at the risk of being numbered among those who. 
Mess hid йй obtained, and Both t the complete тА, was Чао do not “ understand SRi a proof is," I am not p 
кчт ы а ЖЫ. їп RAER ^ eu XS that they had re hei ан ted the moving anchor, and а very 
adopted both the balancing principle adopted in Messrs, | ^9 120116. Mr. Wilkins, that the * ‘sparrow will perish vith hang 
i y |. Mr. Pole, C.E., Inspector of Government Artillery ; rather than touch a caterpillar” The fact admitsof - 
ei г, ewton, patent agent; Mr. Howard, one 9 im simple proof, and the sini is now approac| ; 
existing patents that the present action had been | defendants, and other witnesses were called to p which such * proof” can be obtained by any person 
brought. The questions for the consideration of = T the defendants 1 in KM се benc Роу desirous of settling the i ing ion, J 
jury, as stated by Mr. Bovill, would be—frst, adopted the same princi ‚ Fiskin апа і Derby. y 
Messrs. Fiskin's plough new, and was their але Fowler, had applied it in ue СЕУ E and la d, The Condition of the Working. Classes in ali ДУ 
new; ES secondly, were the improvements of|not infringed the existing paten n "x importa: 2 ў 
т. Fowler ден. He believed there Mec no pre- away i reci iti icableto | 5 
WES Dr Бе SK die Та arek Poen ШИР мешн са ME. to sata the evidence | follow the precepts laid down. Tell а hungry зш 
ike them made bein or "that they were Du useful | 37% 9y there is bread in the baker's shop, 16 will not satisfy his _ 
and valuable inventions. Thomas Fiskin, who admitted having taken a model | appetite unless he has the means of purchasing food. - 
Mr. Carpmael, у agent and civil engineer, was of his ; machino to Rogers їп 1855, and requested. him | The most earnest wish of a labouring man will noè | 
examined a some length. He stated that he had paid | tO cma x dues S IE HE ek hs that time there was | stretch the walls of his cottage, or enable him witha - 
great attention to the construction of implements {ог |а шоуна denied the statements of| wife and six children, and with only three rooms to - 
agricultural purposes, and particularly in reference | Rogers s, bo A - апа r and | shelter them at night, to ве ier 8 sexes, so asto 
to steam ploughing. He had seen u specifications | the moving a Mosi r, and id he had had the. idea of а | observe common decency in his family. When advo 
1 Messrs. oving anchor for years before he succeeded in per- cating any beneficial ‘change i > "Society, “too hard aline | 
en 
m 
232 
b hine. so 
С; ктер dis E аг ted 1 ойе ;|in 1850, in which he described its action. Не added 
: Nux e they ‘patento was altogether out | that he. and Rogers bed in constant consultation as to 
patented by Mr. Fowler were a 
uS ad Us mmngement aT наф "ot end d Chief Justice Erle remarked to the jury t 
Fiskin's machin үгө ы in carrying out an idea he. had do etta 
Mr. abs геа b ME Bra ее ell, С.Е, of Great | Was fairly. entitled to avail himself of the practical 
George Street, Mr. Amos, C.E., nsulti ing engineer to 
dM Royal да solius yis ы Mr. Bovill, C.E., 
Mr. Fowler, of Stockton- ree deposed to having as "they 
introduced Thomas Fiskin o Roge rs in 1855. Pre- 
7 = эы firm of Clayton & emen ‚ Fi i 
s,wasalso examined. Не stated th : en x 
distinetly remembered t t the moving anchor was 
described to him, a leg; the use of each is аныш 
nó во with classes, whose rise i 
P pie eri un em ais volut of d cs ен summing) moy bo progressive according tó. circnmsk 
rage entions both of 
Fowiety were new, and that 1 
—9 would not have ‹ y sol 
sum as 10,0007. for te e CE of usin 5 them if 3 
em believe them to be of the — peces 
| e progr 
did n cos Rs cm. Me. the lowest to the highest offices in the country, 
CR ET е wor an there ha d 
They oy wero quie c ————— AER ТУ ит Gs ins T КЫН С ЫП meal erae саб fa de a 
ustice Erle proc (9 e the j uesting | duti i 
Similar evidence bie эзсе by Mr. Ransome, of the | their careful птоза to tha dn. tbe jur requosting | кү tio RW Ps ne pedi ndr 
rm o° Messrs. Ransome & Sims, implement makers, | was of great importance to the parties concerned... He | office сев, administration ot the laws, poe 
of Ipswich. had reserved some points of law, with which the jury instru e b є ап 28 
Sir Fitzro he e had nothing to do. The con. аср: jo bett 
several obj votis P Eon polius of law in n eh hs беа sideration were—first, had the defendant infringed the п 1лайса Пу, [d more ih 
iencj ecifi ) patent granted to Messrs. Fiskin in 1855; secondly, who e employ him, as well as as more iere and co 
taken by the Lord Chief Justice. He then eed | had he infringed the patent ted to Mr. Fowler in within himself. A little thing x often the 
{ : т id Fiskin | point in : c 
to urge tha was a principle in law that а patent аё | 1856; and thirdly, were Mr. Fiskin and David a man’s character—a 
the time it was ал must be valid. It could not |t and true inventors of the invention un ipoken, or a slight ане а may drive 
be rendered valid by any act done subsequently. their patent of 1855—the screw and the sector. If the Ње publie house. is 
also an established Б that the patent must | де infri the patent granted to upon the cares а о inst 
the inventor and not to any other perso: kin, he had also infri patent granted to | for the “silver lining in the cloud." How ¢ 
ld be able to show that with ге owler. His lord ip, after La i ving but an overcrowded cottage to 
uld b Mr. Fo shi 
>= еге Се two several parts of the | of the jury, at considerable length, to the partieular | wet walk home and a ер toil ? 
ere поб the invention of nature of the MUR improvements which had has never arriv: 
Ük whic h were the invention | been spoken to by the witnesses, handed them in а 38 
Fiskin and а machinist of writing the questions which he had € for auci. by ke Mena 
Willi _ | cost of only per acre, looks 
arley (last y ted by the 
P1ISn 
"3 
am 
power, adl The jury th 2 ] y 
