May 9, 1863.] THE GARDENERS' CHRONICLE AND AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE, 
that the Home-office had sent "down an inspector to inquire | equi uivalent to deut per annum. Eee | Government д. not | single i ot heir giving elementary education. He moved, 25 
into the recent disturbances at the Roman Catholic Ж йс dry propose this measure as one of fin i t. that the votes for edueation ought to be made 
establishment qim St. Bernard, Leicestershire, but that he had | of justice роне Тһеу 1 ot, ools only of 4 rking classes, but to all of 
not yet made his report. lling House. Nevertheless, they 1 he way of proportionate aid to volunta 
(уук зү RUSSELL move i. rs t the House go into | with every neip! f sound ad to e favourable report of á 
Committee on the Corrupt Practices at Elections БШ. —The to the tax-pay nity, and j to the labouring | spector, and to tests of at least elementary instruction being 
Earl of said, as the Bill affected the House of Com А , as favourable in it tendenc in th ects qualified.—Mr. 
h not inclined to oppose it, although he disbelieved АГУЛ and the improvement of their conditio: COCHRANE seconded the amendment.—Mr. HENLEY supported 
legislative enactments to check bribery and corruption —Earl| sion, the rig a o в 9 simpl f ice to the districts in which 
Grey concurred with this opinion. —TE [n then went into | equity, the courage, and the wis class of schools ex , and wh f 
Committee on the Bill, when Lord LYvEDEN moved the inser- | to agree to the rinciple involved in the clause.—$Si 17 years contributed their quo he 
ti clause ualifying agents found guilty of corrupt | core said that the speech of th Chancellor of the t participating in its advantages.— 
or illegal practices. Оп a division ын motion was rejected by d on the fallacy that every man le me observations from Mr. PULLER, Bir ARQ 
66 to 52. An amendment to c e 10 was ed to, but t from the State. He had also miscon D IFFITH, the amen nt rst resolution 
on а division the — сЕ уз rejected by 92 to 26. | the Charity Commissioners, ad n drawn. The House then divided on the second reso- 
Clause 11 having been stru out, the Bui passed | th. cient and time-honoured endo lution, which was negatived by 152 to 117. The 
through Committee, ТЫП 255 же а third time: and | should be muleted with the income tax, —HMr. BouvERIE moved that the House should go into 
assed. — «pare. moved а resolution that the | сег of those charities should be added а g b e upon that por ofthe Act of Uniformity which. 
principle of Charging Entailed Estates for Railways involves | corrected. The propositos of the Govern: 8, с ri ies of chapters, pro- 
questions of too much nicety and importance to be ва: — confiscate 250,0001. a year from the charitfes, ЧЕ в, masters of colleges, and others, to make a declaration 
by Parliament oth: than by public ролей Вт. | income tax might 5 "redis сей and ta e f the Church-of England. His 
LEONARDS suppor е motion. — Lord EvERSLEY mo perib.—Mr. MAGUIRE фөрраровй the scheme as an attempt to propose a resolution on which to found a Bill for 
amendment, **That this House is not endi to with: impose taxation on the lowest iud jo destitute class of the repeal of that requirement, and he sai that his motion 
from idi t ой Railway Bills clauses | the community. Ha де he 10 votes he would give them | was made at the instance of the resi sident Mano: oc ihe Univer- 
which may confer such pow if certain speci ed conditions | all against the proposal — жй Н. VANE ааты — sity of Cambridge.—Mr. WALPOLE resis фен observ- 
were agreed to by the tenant res life.” # A discussion ensued, | ingenuity of the Chancellor of the stie AATA iug that the House had already on tw d red 
in which the Earl of Romney, Lord RAVENSWORTH, Lord Рокт- but was unable to eo with him in his dad uA. and derided. the question, and that u: н 8-4 mo good reason 
MAN, Earl GRANVILLE, ed E ers GnrY took part. Ultimately | Мг. W. Мавтіх put in а special plea on behalf of county were shown to the [ums it ought upon кле н е, policy, 
the amendment was negativod without a division, and the itals.—Lord R. СЕсп, commented with much severity ani ЖОНДЕУ; to adhere to that bmp emen 
resolution was agreed to. пе principle of confiscation laid down by the SrANLEY said that the proposal now made was different 
FRripAY.—Poland.—The Earl of SHAFTESBURY, in pre e Exchequer, who һай, he said, sp ith | to that made in 1856. It would ay from 
a petition from a meeting of merchants and others, еа * ihe bitterness of the nag and raged with fury in denunciations ny right ich they ssed, 
Guildhall, in favour of the Poles, said that he had 61 other 
petitions from various places. Тһе separation of Poland from 
st be the is e 
t already 
The ĈHAIRMAN havin p LE Lone e the CHANCELLOR of 
the Раат said that, as 
had declared themselves in favour of the clause, it was qui 
unnecessary tô take the sense of the House upon it.—Mr. 
EE 
Ё® 
ES 
Он 
K 
ZE 
i 
ER 
Р 
ве 
Bo 
Bd 
E 
DE 
© 
E 
ES 
ДЕ 
ш 
£a 
They look ро: 
ention, as they desired 22d ependenee, Не believed that 
Saia л йн  СОДөшн an P wer 4 directed, ласа зато 
ten thousand times greater than the armed f 
the Baltic, 
[Left speaking.] ! 
Mon». Police. —In reply to din 
GREY 3-714 ru аз А Bill for the amalgamation "x us Ot 
aoh Моро Police У Hos posed to тер alocal and personal the country at he was 
act, the orders of ne ouse of Mg e required that i that Hio СООЧУ, an againstit. The 
ES ders, fundamental fai! apt its дий C 
that hi А eq , without disturbing the relations between the 
qun. from country, than which nothing could be more Established Church and the State. In 1837, the late Sir 
a d ed, deservi the best co e- 
E: B in the nature of a pri llacious or illogical.—Lord PALMERSTON defe: nded the policy | R.. Peel had suggest as deserving nsid. 
phu jn i Pied with in the pct d qa РЕ à | we n of the Chancellor of Exchequer, which, he said, was founded | ration of the HK a plan by which the owner, not 
МохтАО irai under no san єз, e ea ax in justice and good sense, and had the entire approval o his | the occupier, should be liable to the rate, without any 
exon and complained naf iue Govern. | colleagues. . The fact; however, was that the House was|tvidióts tedt -boing imposed upon Dissenters. These 
ment, contrary to the unders tanding of two years ago, had influenced by local associations, and under these circumstances | suggestions and others made in the report of the 
studiously a b he House, although hey hi Chancel or of the Exchequer had, he tho ought, exercised а | Committee of the House of Lords were embodi 
mustered in considerable force in the lobby.—Mr. D. GRI wise discretion in withdrawing the proposition.—After a few | his Bill, which, assuming, as the fact was, that Ohurch-rates 
and Mr. CocHRANE also deprecated the conduct of the words from Mr. HENLEY M т. ТООКЕ the етан Е ere a charge upon land E real property, removed all per- 
overnment as being evidently guided by a desire to get rid of negatived without а divis The remaining clau Pos that the 
ihe discussion of inconve t su t BSTON agreed to, and the House ij The Savings Bant M i ain a burden upon 
denied th: e Gove: p 1 0050 ough УРУШ, amd the одете Bonda The Con Rd th аны and p n explained and 
b r 
were ird time and passed. The Nav by which n за tih 3 
mental Fund Society "Winding- мр Act Eis ene Bill was read а р CEY did V HO MOON — Sir С, DovaLAs moved WS Rn 
че с after а short debate. Other Bills were forwarded amendment that the Bill be read a second time that day six 
sta nths.—Lord HENLEY seconded the amendment, considering 
from that the settlement рр, by pepi Bp: Mg not te ME 
wi 
members had grievances to zm they pem to РИНГ down down 
their friends to help them to make a House.—Mr. DISRAELI 
— —The War си -— TH Tien. n z question феа тн em s n en 
1 ЕЗ respectin e death of Lieut. Tinling, of H.M.S, | factory 
ressed his ий that the E had not жеу slightest E nee of 
varier egere 13 m pm cem I уты Боб s.—Sir б. GREY said that, es the Bill contained some 
valuable suggestions, i his opinion it did not hold га апу 
ш о ав: 
апа. a reg rem the income tax fadus в, үү rofes: sion ns, and 
an e 0! 
i r. AL m 
of the Crown had inquired into the case, and had recommended second reading of his Church-rates Redemption Bill. Its object, 
ч ed of t егп. te's ВШ; 
men! m: 
exemption was to h he was quite pr 
modify the clause bus vent the upon | that 45001. should be demand f Peruvian ^ Ре observed, was different from that of Mr. Newdega' Ш; 
funds which w posed of in the shape of salary. pe: àon for the y | 16 was not to perpetuate Church-rates, but simply to rovide 
He was prepared to бду that 19- f the charities | Cai White. The latter was, however,  dissatis-| means of redeeming them, as had been done with regard to the 
whieh it Was proposed to tax were derived from death-bed fied, and had in а claim to the Foreign Office | land-tax.— Mr. , s ded the motion.—Mr. NEWDE- 
bequests. The ден of the country, as gathered from the | for 292,1741., of Lehich 30, 0001. was for kicks inflicted upon him, | ӨАТЕ spoke against the second reading, and Mr. DopsoN in 
income tax returns, was about 180 or 190 Zw a year, of | 50001. for being compelled to eat bad food e five days, and | favour of it.—Sir G, GREY said he should not object to the 
which about t| millions belon; eharities. These | 20,0001. for injury done to his health. vernment had | second reading of the Bill, which, however, req his 
charities he divided into three classes—the g, to submit the matter to arbitration, and i opinion very extensive alteration s in he ooe ачат пози 
and the great. Wi rd to the first of these he had no that some satisfactory arrangement wonld be observations by Mr. GRIFF. т. Briscoe, the second read- 
atso far from being valuable they were ional Education,—Mr. WALTER move resolutions, to the | ing n €— ona di vision "UL 8L to T2. 2 The ВІ. was there- 
i by tending to pauperise th ple, and | effect, 1 t the sums annually voted for educational purposes | fore lost. House then went into Committee on the Security 
destroy their sense of та туч c €: эе -теНапсе. Аз an be plicable to all the rer l gh- from Violence Bill of Mr. Adderley, when а тош discussion TK 
illustration he mention s's Ch: ch | outthecountry ( eing private schoolsor carried on for profit), lace, on the motion of Mr. асос E, to amend the firs! 
consisted gi 00, бош. те © DA. poor v^ thr ms s parishes ii in Here- | in which the attendance and examination of the children exhibi ing the infliction of cor js nt 
fordshi о be doled out to the inhal but | the results rı ed under the revised code by the inspectors of | applicable only to second and subsequent convictions On a 
under no e was any portion of the fund te to be ex- | schools; and 2. That to require the employment of certificated division, the am ent was negatived by 37. Several 
pended on buildings. 25 fund, however, accumulated so fast | teachers, or of р teachers by school managers, as an indis- erbal amendments having been made on clause.—Mr. 
that the trustees were compelled to come tc Parliament for an pensable condition of their participation in the co itation анны, d th ч thi Nec a report progress ; but the 
act to enable them to екран 30,0007. upon the construction d by 159 to 32. Оп the question that the 
8 е rejec! 
Schools. He urged that а capitation grant of 8s. oug ht clauso АЙА part t e Bill the House again divided, and it 
giv o whic hi childr agreed to by 144 to 31. The Bill was chen reported to the 
should pass an ех: in the three elementary Houma e. The Ma дд Дейш о Misi Non Bill, introduced 
branches of нон. p T» Satisfaction of the inspector.— | by Mr. MoNsELL, an and the Admiralty бошт Uh удан) bil 
Mr. Вохтох seconded the motion.—Mr. Lowe said he did not read a second. 
x ground 
of a boarding school for - labourers’ chi ldren, thereby doing 
thi А 
2 e 
я 1 hers, 
the Govetuinent t6 remit Lim favour of that class to the | believed that, if it were agreed to, the "шше system of 
pe of 70001. a year. Тһе D, e called Christ's | national education would degenerate into a mere scramble for 
Hospital was an appropriate illus f tho great charities. veg ковак нь Pope: m Tun Government ought not to 
It enjoyed] public contributions to the ze g 60001. a year, Hie, ot tested the 
ж pe ou of at le ан} 70,0001. It was originally 
inte 
not the class who w admitted to its benefits. he the 
a trary, the pedi Me v wee the children of wit x 
incomes from 2001. to 500L a year, while the чоон 
return for a payment of 5001., received a vested interest ir 1600 
tations. It к ta 
Буена Departmen riod of rest and tranquillity, to 
wait and see the nig of "da o changes already made, and not 
to чаве n i o of men upon € important question.— 
The supported ried by M d opposed 
was а necessary consequence of the 
id Eder wh Which ч we lived, and the principle of the measure would 
ion spectioi an j prisons of e 
hip—ought to receive aid in the shape ofa test of 
certified tutors) 
d public money. The motion would abolish Lew iq the 
wo latter tests, and open the Treasury to all 80 on the 
Dissen! 
E ALK seconded the motion.—Mr. MORRITT, 
p woo aile Y 12401. for the improved dien value of the Church. 256 "t. EE E cs 
institution had derived a substantial advantage Mr. G. Durr, Sir J. PAKINGTON, and 
i 
