THE NEWSPAPER. 39 
Ags eter Company tor sr a Id a special [and Proceeds to discuss the Charitable Bequests Act | asked permission of his revered Liberator to call him 
c Defender of the Faith. rig oe pc M.P., addressed 
to oe branches fren Durston, be-| “Itr = mired no extraord inary sagac city to aperos iv arg you, urse of his remarks 
i on. il; iy ot to sup- | which u se i 
$ Tet the Catholi a igion, 0 whic were principal yd piva st the Union, and 
édon-road station pa ce raat t He and ie ‘Coupaiett ht the tottering pem ort ee paR ney. If a p mt of clerg lies generat by those igs "believed 
eran wi e a ateri ompany jars pernaan pisari policy as well as justice you houi bare done, | in he doctrines thes i ught, he j= ae sai A e D 
Bristol terminus 3 he Af o determined tee to legislate on a principle of common fairness towards the Ca i hat } Ve hi 
i ilw: For t nise in } ights and 
ec 
olics, why gh di 
apostolical jurisdiction on which this “penal law incontestably no use in atten ing the B 
de, y the 4th February to the 6th gë Binoy merely for the pur- 
p.~ 
ses ‘the Siarehslaers authorised the patron to | encroaches? Yet, withthe attempt to injure and degrade, you, 
an additional ai of Aai 0002. by the issue of | and a few hollow encomiasts, take credit to yourselves for ac- | pose of assisting to pass an Arms Bill ke Ireland. Mr. 
00 third shares at 337. 6s. 8d. per s rt Be ty be dis- | knowledging, for the first time, the rights a titles of the | Q? Co on nell next addressed the meeti eS 
in the eiten of one new third to each old episcopacy in Ireland! Yes, you acknowledge to insult them ; | £ ps te 
es I t d A and even the honour you show has in it all the bitterness of | 
on notifying the acceptance, and payin the de-| scornful derision. How do you honour even those venerable Parliamentary committe ee on the questior of whet her 
f 27. before the 3lst inst; 4 per ‘cent. pew prelates whom you have made members of your ministerial | Irish Repeal members ought to atten d in uae Hie 
allowed on all calls.—The Lanca ster and Car | pean? By giving them the titles of bishops, without sees, and | during th Th “a 
tated the waditt mblazoning over their heads the sole and exclusively legiti- eee ming session. e question, must, 
E Miate titles of others to the same sees which their sainted and | therefore, remain in abeyance for another week. He 
i veconsentedtoacknowledge. | then proceeded to develope the general principle 
on Company a? the nonin of her oic predecessors would never ha | th 
consideration of 5 sopra) of | The nnot wo lawful bishops of the same see. There- | i ; 
0 a of spective epithets of ‘ Catholic’ and “ Protestant’ might, if com- | be ich he ng pT eand tro down, that nothing could 
i be a i isti | be expecte 7 re n rom the eg Parliament ; 
s F 
o 
ent. on the capital of 400,0007., promise could ìl admitted, mark the distinct sources | 
gamation, o ne third share o Toii bev of their apostolical or Parliamentary jurisdiction. But, instead | that no Par which nglishmen predo- 
cent. All encumbrances, including the lease to the | of this, the Protestant prelates we wens fi Ar] as the Arch- | mi inated w ould Topislate jhe for the Irish, be whom 
bishops of Armagh and Du’ lin, without any quali cation, while, 
tl ay Ro ahate 0 A e HOt, go o with the in insulting and subordinate contras! KAip Catholic prelates are pe they would only flin e the gr s while the ey secure d the 
perty arlisle line is progress- | announced as archbishops of—nowhere. But you give t ma arcass for themselve n de oq sapan again the 
oss and the contracts have be ade on | pre nee, = — in society! jeten oN strip them of t ir | state prosecu tions, alleging ery thar e legal 
g A meeting ~~! = inhabitants | Tights, as far as in you lies. You amuse them with the shadow j mae for = — isonment ote fi it od been dis- 
Bifo rd has been held, for the dse of con- of ceremony, “which is unmeaning but as far as it is significant pr d tha th t at all the Sees “G6 
n- | of substantial rights and duties And you humble them with [ped 3 no ata person w 0- 
ring me propo, new lines oft ra aira) to and | the condescension of your insulting patronage, such as you The mer rning yi de e 
Stephenson, on behalf of the | would exhibit to some exiled and fallen dynasty, fixing on them | of Saturday contain ab a strong, but rfect, reason 
more strongly the gaze of p ockery of a homage of | why the Irish — ae to t take rabies seats in the 
If they à 
that e 
lo ate ham Co i y a: ity, by the m 
C SER fe a to the] hich you disown the legitimate foundation. What would her | 
es xford w e respect of any indivi | House of Com id so, argued that paper, 
nd 
g t advantag that O ould derive | Prime Minister think of th tof any individual for Royalty | 
carrying out the inten don ‘orcester | who would allow Her Majesty the name of Queen, withholding | uccessful ly lied fi 
ford Railway, particularly from the | Pe oe Great Trae ec Ireland,’ on whisk ikia state ‘trial, with all its iniquity, they would obta 
i i ounded? Surely the recognition of her name could not disguise 
¥ Pere cae conveyance of coals from the the want of fidelity necessarily included in any such omission of | | umph over the Irish Gov ment, and ba age - eniai 
Ffelds of the } idland Counties to Oxford and | her rightfal title. Of what inconsistency and confusion is not | of getting some of the pari ties who figured in that trial 
fhbourhood, which he assured the meeting would be | bigotry productive! You woald fain conte on some of our | impeached and punished ; while, on the other hand, if 
ea bisho rliamentary juris iction which you ar ncom. : HA 
r 16s. z getting es n a E for somethin ng like petent to give, an prive others o heir ery ant: | the os ne eta ed & y — gtd So 
per ton, ins ead o 25s. and 26s. per ton, jurisdiction, w which you are as incompetent to take away; a them t dan additional argument for Repeal of 
e, he stated, a by way of indemnify ner’ the one for the indignity of mas er | the Union. His answer to that was, that they were sure 
pect to Rugby, through the important town of slaves, to aes h you — to eee tiem, fonte bim a} E fail; and that if the Chronicle ow! its Whig party 
ministerial licence of making @ Sl the apos o- | 
ford agrees: through or | Heal ents Of their brethren, You expect that they will do all | thought the y could make it 
Strat or -on-Avon, and ata the Va ale of Eve an s to pene = pee: of that anti-national and odious | 4S Rad in the absence as in the pat bas of the Irish 
inet another br Satin = aei so ates, aged — -be — rs, | m mber In the same article, she an me 1 oe in 
= hing, “including in its course the poured forth ‘it ie other day their usual contributions o or- | callie ot on Ehei seta: thet 
re Bicester and Aylesbury. The difere ence be- | iolon hatred on the idolatry and tyranny of the Church of | ads ort wed ers to expect a Repeal of pe Union. 
is 
n Eig i DANS tke. ett Res He declares that the fear of a conçordak are hie Pope | te was reall Min a pee at hat tb Ps pe Hee 
aded t} . E fa going | hae 4 hli alent the meee h o the dang SI nd wou Lavé cease agi itating until they obtained 
w 
latter line, as the advantageous situatio a ee mtingent dang ee se ae eee so: | Repeal. Indeed, a more degraded set of miscreants never 
meaner, ey | deb A ased a than the rish sope — n — 
u i ative ü 
ee er mies | tabled at home, and laboue to close the breach which steed ir s an M wax patote, Mi O'Connell 
Rolie +i ener "or the tä ai line Pa s been recently made in the bulwarks of its oly Tt touched upon no other topic, and concluded by — 
carried almost unanimously, to ker es a me- pline.” He concludes by calling upon Sir R. Peelto let | that the parliamentary committee be empowered to sit 
t oa of Fei ne EA The t his first recommendation to Parliament be the repeal of | for another week to prepare the oe already alluded 
o PSREN AT TE iird woma Lid pty the Bequests Act.—A letter has also been published by | to, _ The gio otion was | agreed to and the rent for the 
of 18 to 7 BS o pose the repre Me special Dr. Higgins, i EN Biskop of Ardagh, in which he de- As 
, aren pe Pilot, to the effect el 
g of the Chester and Birkenhead Compan ae ; 
= last week, for the purpose of i Ta Bishop sie eta Bake if an gre egy Batatas Court or Q B (Sitti: n Banco.)—The B 
icati i i , ou UEEN’s Bencu—(Sittings in Banco.)— 
= E ied thei resus oe gee ee be sent out, it should by no means be confined to one | de Bod v The Queen.—This was a case in which the Sevan ae 
ave te at eis l eat ee rt t > S bisbop; and after some severe observations. on. the ir reg rag spieri =r za ht, pad clamet 
3 z sal “a He = A ‘ira h English Catholics at Rome, he says—“ It is somewhat eer plee the seat alge wed a etude mA sp raras s% 
to confirm the j z :th T he mare p nsoling, however, to refle oi pa with all their com- | pensation to British subjects whose estat had been forfeited 
® the Direct project ; the present being restricted | bined and wicked efforts, they xtort | by the authorities of France at the period of the French Revo- 
ie Directors power to apply to the Legian | nothing from Rome sare the very, harmless Tete An de iogne tat eran re Mata mat 
da’ ead relalntion foe es Sask m oabr ie BIE We receive that document w with the profoundest r re- e- | aceraed within the reign of Her present Majesty. The case was 
Gocer wih th aie ma naps a z spect, as ae from the Pro tried in June lest, when the jury gavea verdict for the suppliant 
ermin tne- er fgg P G ristot | of our venerated Holy Father ; ; bat, -being purely ti aim as a Britis 
b isely 
’ Z Sarg? unanimously adopted. ga asgow | thetica 
pnei arliament and | snd gi moreover, the bene Eol inoran that in- 
nly dif 
rd of giv 
the Ed ee rego the propesed ge = lt trigue rise Taisrepresentation = the Hir : r 66, 
sgo : with interes! e ue 
ow ross the streets of | weh pate i t9 pae counter woe Court a sg a e| namely, tae ‘the cause of action did not arise with ix years, 
ties ter o —_ Y | and that it did not arise during Her Majesty’s reig: he cross 
b own, and the other by 
7 means of arches thrown a ofco 
an : r fo 
os peee mooo in favour of the proposed removed, ay making his Hol ees et PE: oe | rales had been obtained, one e 
s ay, as being the shortest route between | real. conduct and condition of the clergy and rire the m, each praying to enter judgme! 
e south d ca a deal with our rofi of | the verdict on certain issues for the other side. Mr. M. D: au 
est.” iP 5: Mr. Sergeant Manning, Mr. Mellor, Mr. Young,and Mr. Anstey 
Bode; Sol £ 
p 
mfries line, to reduce the distance mate- ; ; 
bet h slanderers: as his sr — may s gest. 
fer, nen Einbar gh and Carlisle, Liverpool; Man- | Catholic bishop, Dr. Kennedy, who was one of the first | an nd Mr, Waddington for the Crows “Mr. Hill appeared to show 
uests Act. against the rule obtained by the Solicitor-General. It 
see — office nder the "Beq ejin A Acts bet Pong very difficult to deal with such a rule, for it seemed that it 
! > aoe , sieht to enter the jadgment of the Crown on the t of the. 
Freland. „of the prevailing differences, Bishop Kennedy |i issue. The suppliant prayed that the judgment shou for. 
ib in. ~The agitation on the C ct, but sho him on the whole record, and consequently on this issueas 
Re a letter addressed | that the people are in error on many points, and that the me: s ee ike canis nowe S = bapena 
ey, es M‘Hale, Roman Catholic Archbishop Act has byn of the regular umier the consideration of the Lord Chancellor. The suppliant 
» to Sir R. Peel. This docum | worse than it was Eoas moved in the Court of Chancery for a commission, a motion 
[22 the Premier for his r clergy worse than ie man Yos hald son Monday. r. | PECE was ota ay ae en Se Cecio hoa the 
and a no less angry “denunciation of pas Kelly, M.P., took the chair, and sdis ressed Sni meeting | natter one of Praa pa preire E amang the pre- 
i of England, which it proclaims as powerless to | at some length. He called the attention of the meeting | cedents. dive months afterwards he delivered judgment in 
e the | to the exertions and sacrifices made by the le g mem- | favour of a commissi he found in every one ao hatsoch 
Amentable state of social disorgani sajs Arch- | bers of. the Associationin the cause of Repeal, without | a course had been pursued. THe o Yoana all the facts alleged 
“to which I have alluded is felt pe deplored | any other hope of reward but that of seeing their | to be true. The state of things at that time was this:— 
he English prelates, who confess the: hadi unable comes! s paaie established, and. its industrious | te Croa, without admitting one of t facts, might. the 
S bis epis- | resources develo ; denounced the Riband system, and | pete agp anny i icase.. Tie Lord Chancellor did 
i in expre a ssed a cf tbat, at the Peet Bi ~ wea in that case give fadgment that t the apes of Fight didnotlies 
of the | com a. mi e traced to same course might have been x mon- 
Chance! r of those magistrates upon whom the peop! trous that the Crown, after this lapse of years, should now 
: rtial dispensers 0 jus- have put the suppliant to this expense and this trouble, and 
— : pe $ J should now, for the first time, aise the question that might 
tice. . Mr. Somers, M.P., handed in his subscription, | have been decided at an. earlier period; and the more so, At the 
together sears that saat Mr. ‘Terao, w whom hedescribed | Crown did not at the trial-dispute oneof those facts, or at least 
an ex elan pi rietor in the count: Lei- | did not one witness. It would not, of course, be asserted, 
r pop fr F Ped B simple | tat a writ of right did.not lie bat for land. There could be no:* 
trim, snd nie at convert m ge a bie Pos platens fn M to saya! that ibeni ad n nipel a aiat y e 
rr x i peal. re Q Once | Crown for unliquidated e numerous autho- 
y en atte han they are | admissi mber of th prore and took oc- | rities the other way, by chief of uka, noy She b ankers’ case, 
own mission as a member of the ’ I 
tha at from the Establishment t, though retaining casion to observe that the fee! gin favour of simple | in i4 owell, Stal e Sec judgment ae n against 
S of a church, the a gee that ani- s and. f | Charles H., andan Act of Par jament passed to provide the 
s gone; and ins! tead of th rath gour | Repeal ov w erne was mpl gainin g .. OF | money to satisfy ti jadgment. The principle was clear, and 
ed th clin | people now w that Federalism, ead of lessening, | the atop pert <= were at such as to deprive the 
inerease diments ade en |) suppliant of his , It was said thatthe 59th Geo. IIT.,c.31 
ical | would in T ng ld nae Fede was an answer tothe claim. He denied it, but if that opinion 
ructions.”” | get ‘bey wow rats, | was sincerely entertained by the advisers of the Crown, why 
S| he must repeat, had not the same course been pursued by them 
x Pi 
Peel Wishes to bring after. -T 
E including I4 from a Catholic priest; ” who | in this case as in that of Lord Canterbury? Why had not the 
