40 THE NEWSPAPER. Ying 
whole question of the legal title of the Baron been raise r the Fine Arts, and supported wholly or in part by voluntary | be required. The Military Officers are 
farther 
decided in the year 1839? But even supposing the Uegisiture | su subscriptions, shall be nom Bhagat i to that the position and construction of the works ae 
had made certain encroachments, founded avowedly — od | n eien vets — Bos core ne sedi aa eCinrke an > for the nee ofthe proponsd babese aries 
tain recitals of fact — were octet e Parl at pa proto of the revising Barrister’ rt e, and of M E cided on until the exact site and relation of the Ab de- 
en were ot paaa ‘cen ct. He denied that the Crown | Bodkin, on the other side, the aes - c See es the shore shall have been finally ined. Cona 
could get rid of its duties by simply assigning its assent to an emption claimed, e» Orcon a making any partition sion.—The commission cannot close their Onciu. | 
acid aai whe rri E arni ee b i . i money, among the Members, yet that there is | expressing in the strongest te their una he 
Pinty ponai epg EET eno doubt that the | nothing in the bye-laws specially restraining them from oe m nion and entire conviction that measures are indian 
Ba ‘on de s a Briti orn subject. e won e This decision, if a good agas, T als napana riri ia A sably necessary to give to the sou ‘hath fea a 
titled to sit in Parliament. His property had been unduly con- | ment tana Be nar stron free = roe Src ere srs t ingdom means and facilities which it does not b: 
fiscated, and the compensation for it had been duly paid. Why | the scien ossess for powerful naval protection. With Dow i” 
was it now withheld from him? It was ogo because the “Giiseellancous, t tidal arbon A aa i ithout uy, y 
Crown was powe l, and he was weak. The 2 eceding z S*uscell a exoept tid z ong rki ole coast between Patge a 
little ‘creditable the Crown.—The Solicitor- Serai in su —Some months ago. the Lo mouth an ames, and none accessible to i 
prvi a ‘per thought tof W Sem bw mr d that we treated || ar fener mi pea E inquire into E there i is now, when steam points to such pa % 
as a matte eeling, but of law. ireasur a i 
de Bode had in law made out his title to maintain his demands. A defences of the coast, and the Diypetety of forming | ¢ ae oy in bag affairs, an imperative necessity fog) 
This claim appeared to be wholly without he this w The first harbours of refug me ying, by artificial mai i y h h i 
i r the Court to decide was, whether his was a ow = throu ‘out ë narrow par ar 
fy enich papi to of right could at alllie. By two treaties of | Admiral Sir B. Ma rtin, Chairman, Lieut.-Gen. Sir gho i p » channel, 
e dis Bigs 
wi ati i 
1814 ant 1818, a sum on money was paid by the Go overnment of Howard Donte; Hae Admiral Du ndas, = Sir Wil- | tance chart whic Me ote fers this report, shows the | ye 
Gove n satis- ; 
fink a claims for property of British sor ttt undaly confiscated ae 
Se ne eee eta which the money should be distri. | J. H. Pelly, Bart., Capt. Fisher, R.N., and Mr. James | afford shelter to our commerce. By these meang a 
buted. “Phe. 16th’ section of that Act declared, that after the | Walker, President of the Tiston of Civil Engineers. | Wi ith the ea vantages of steam by sea, and of railroads a 
The Co i 
1 
distribution made, ‘as.thereby directed, the surplus if.any, mmis sioners have just ublished thei report land, the naval a 
should be paid idoverso the seputsstonle of.the Treasury. If a pš P cont Polar fae ce of the country ` thay be thrown in 
a was a British subject, he a uid by that a caaer Fi | strength upon any point of-the coast in a few 
he a not ag? ae portio. piaia of money, whic! 
ordefs o co! gones, had been paid over to the ie important Subject of of their ere Théfollow- | The several recommendations we have thought 
Fords ot the Treas yv, then, could he maintain the peti | ine are their conclusio ns, which state concisely Me. chist duty to lay before your Lordships must, if adop 
tion of a re say ofright was a remedy against | 198 2 Be nat —Hay- | occasion a large outlay of the: public money; but 
the Crown’; but if Was doubtful whether it would be fo - points of the report :— lif Gati an gt oe Ms ri ft a 
fic chatti in the possession of the It certainly did | ing made sw oh, Seas seer epei the raged ife, property, national »s ty are the interests 
not lie for unliquidated damages. There was, therefore, nO | ports: as may ban urs to e nable i see Lordships t o | stake, we do not believe that pecuniary considerat 
pretence for saying that such a petition as this was maintain- fi 6 a . the will be allowed to a ethe pocoo ie ent of obj 
able ag@inst the Crown for — _ — ly all theautho- | form a ju pmo On ll the at? | of stich vast import This is signed by alld 
rities wert collected in the ban case, Howell’s State | ai eck t "Si 7. S Emi ho sdk 
Trials. bits Charles II. had ora certain nian a charge | tention which its A Seen pose we recommend :— | commissioners excep Wy. y ı who 
so Sandie mon One awn Tor moneys iconen Tom Sa a harbour be constructed in Dover y according | follows :—“ I area i report, because hem 
hem, by bic e was enabled to maintain the c r of 520 a to low | sider the mass of e e to@be in favour < 
without going to Parliament. “He then closed the Exchequer, plan No. 1 with a an area 6 up aah bee ause E cannot recommend a 
after having got bagi of money. Erocealinge mee arn pest mark, tł me-fathom = m edge ; 3 pane fs bes he bold 
aui, a bagay ee letters patent to the claimants to wide on ae south front, and | 
re the r the Revolution, the holders of these pi we a 70 Lig east end. Entertaining the | ground ralnt and the engineers say it will silty 
promi pitent kara wie by petition of right to the King, but | another of 100 a . 2 
to the Exchequer, to direct the moneys appropriated to be paid | strong opinion we have expressed of the necessity 
i RTHS.—On the 23d ult., at Ickworth, Lapy A. Hi 
overtothem. The Exchequer thought the application ought | of providing, without delay, a sheltered anchorage Signe danshi- druit: at Woodeotes Lane a Cons 
to be ed it of as brought, and then Lor Ba 
i ich he > 
27t 
in Dover ay, we ve ntur: ure to urge wai r Lor a daughter—25th ult.,in St. George’s-place, Lapy E. Bi 
Somes delivered that elaborate judgment in whic ove Sa bin —26th ult., at 7, Codrington-place, Brighton, the lady 
ruled the jadgment of the Shoe sagged Chamber, Ne is | ships’ mediately beginning a cai NSON, eds of a son ali ant heir—36th 6th ult., at Grove.tes 
judgment, however, was afterwards overruled in the House | the work by carrying out that dee which is is to com- | zace, Queen’s-road, s. 
of pereg = banker's cane es not a petition of rignt mence at Chee esman’s s He ad. What ever may te finally DEATHS.—On the 26th Dec., 1844, at M 
anything in the least degree resembling a pe- f 
ote E Tight It roceedi in th di e in | Esq. eldest and only AA sonat i 
n h was p ing in the or ictal TE in se, in the county of Wilts, M.P. for 
and in the ordinary Courts of Justice. There was o au. Dover Bay, the pier from Cheesman’ s Head, run out Seat = Taea a Syst an re ? i 
R 
al 
wat ry ep 
annuity, it would be er an annuity so created was a | their completion. This s wil ill | give sheltered access to the Aal 
rent-charge—was, in fact, something which partook of the t harb l west gales, and protect it | at Newingt ma ee 
realty, and consequently Aea an exception to the rule he fi f hi e fi the westward; it will 
had already stated. That accounted for a ‘decision of the | ‘rom entrance of shingle from the field-place, 
banker's case. The difference einech the kt day and afford pe e also for observation on the movement of the Freg anai Esq., of Uttox 
past times, when the poen r a personal ri wan con- shingle within the bay, and for lave r inquiry as to the ee 
prt and had — Consequence of t the revenues } ANTED, AS GARDENER.—A young in 
of the Crown being n eleri ed by Parliament.—Lord Den- | ““"0°RCY ‘il 
m 
an: Then is not thes tomes the same in all times ?—The | C0ast, have t up. Thes se inquiries t the 
y \ ee is pthc of entor a 
Solicitor- General said it was not.—Lord Denman: But the Emtee Bier nds to Sa of essential importance, r ie small s ‘ 
arden. Every 
Barons of the Exchequer have always been officers inferior to | results will afford the means of deter sat = the | 7? gement a 
Chancellor and Treasurer, Is there any instance of a judg- tho advertia 
ment in advertum in that Court?—The Solicitor-General | Steater or less width that imag x given Heat Lae 
answered that there was mone. There was no precedent at all | trances of the proposed harbou . We pr aja se et a | Direct to A.B. -s ROSE ONS Clap! z miles 
for any petition of righ at was strictly rong al Noe vo bre akwa ter be constructed i in Seaford, t in a depth W AN in a respectab = mily p? 
I oe ses the j drat sia as that the King’: tent, and London, a single Man not nl than 26 Se 
be rem ; but that related to real estate, pome enid no jot Fhe an No. 2. | has lived in the country as THO OUGH ka “er 
applicable fo p persdiaities oTi sonan cal had n Po T ad Be *| in Livery. 
clu the Court rose, and on T bada he resumed 3 That a brenkwater | ad conircted T in re ay, | lent character of twa Poses s 
oo gos heres "He ee at first that the rete of right w: rth-eastern direc- | young woman a: 
not an applicable remedy to any case of this kind, and next, A d on rave an e 
that the circumstances here did not show ‘ht ti fo have any tion rfr — ee ik the northe ig point “of ae i business, and ei Si 0 A. B., Pos 
title which he could claim to be: enforced. The claim, if any, | about seven fathoms of water, having an opening z to be post- 
Tested upon treaties. The mere fact of birth ta not — 150 fect at a quarter of a mile from the shore, and | me WANT PLACES.—All Letters to 
tute a person a subject the ou ere he was bor RDENER.—A marrie Mu, = 
The law of domicile affected that question, the Pater ved of If onl ki b detak t „we an AS I RDENER.— prac’ 
the father being that which governed the marriage and cha- oniy one Work IS to be undertaken a 5 28, without incumbrance, who po po ranches, and cal 
Tacter of the child. Dalhousie v. Macdougal, and Munro and | the preference to Dover, next ~ Portland, nae 3dly, to | knowledge of his profession in all its vor particulars i 
Munro, in T. Clark and Tronelly’s Reports, were most impor- | Seaford. Mode of Constructi n.—Various plans for | highly recommended | by his employer a Maresficld, 
D Neon a ted and a Poy us wc Fort na ilaren | constructing breakwaters have one laid before us by c ia pi r. Wos and Son, Nursery 
ngland an mained here for years, yet field, S 
pes oer ae a catirlorpged Fh mad be |i highly intelligent individuals, whose rojects are noted | —— ERA -A Married Man, 
— oe Shoe were held to be Scotch, and succe in the Appen and fully explained in the evidence. : 
anil oe the st Foren ae a a patie bagi We are ome ‘by your Lordships to report ~ 
pur: su cset Bor eram hoor = AS ha foreign pense to be incurred by th Seg sao f t 
untry as Paie d the authority of these cases was theri ee ch we recommen nd; but a no a 
te) 
fore di poit Sra It did not seem, therefore th 
de Bode coud Show that he was a aoii 
co 
Beror 
he ritish subject; and if he . 
uld not, then there clearly an ond of his dei aim; but if he cine les 
could do so, then it was plain that he was, as such, bound by | the engin ho have res us, a other autho- | © 
-A aioe of the 50th George II., he not h: y com- | rities upon these poena points. The various opi- an unex 14 years, who is removin 
ther wis horor pepino ke poeh ge in, “1 a have been considered by the commission, who | mr, Wild’s pees Agen 
could not be supported. The rule, therefore, ought to be al r for the construction of breakwaters, on for the 
lute for entering the verdict for the Crown.—Mr. Kelly, on | securi rection | ra 
e sam — his total inability to discover a of w n do not offer any | 
national o legal g ndon beer the claim might be supported. alis of ponents pegs commissio l a to ps pie 
in the frst = ace, i ‘denied t that the claimant had made out his | . © ce y M'INTOSH, 
title to sidered a British subject; in the next, the claim- | Insure to the structure the requisite stabi “ . They con- or to Mr. Tones 
ant did secerper to have complied wit provisions of the diiri that a will be best decided by th oe inserted withou dge n or 
Act of Parliament. The first of these matt vi he GA Sone Noblema n oe 
portant, since it affected not oniy S spectante faite! m elons, © 
treati ce in 
Parliament, but to claim an for if m struction having been PE Sha be the same 
British subject, the question might aris whether the Wrench whether it be masonry o pies > rough stone 
Governme: i i mig 
meted, hid ia dfu similar to that of (Bymowth Breaate, the commi ssion 
gi 
of Lyng 4 Mr. M white 
at 4 anak m Court EM that of the 
orks at the m aged D 
nated for that day, but might be | 2,500 "0004; Seaford, 1: 250, a? yen wa 500, ccm | NERA young Man, Mine ol = j 
w Cas orpus.— -Lora rå Den arwich, 50,0007. Military ee fehe ti- Thb military acti deny conv: versant sige. Daere ptionable re 
o case, members of the commission are of pore that there | zig sels n, Flow E» f irect to B. at irs: OF 
ve hts hg pert nthe sald that will be no difficulty in providing for the ee of the | öst character 
hte ae poh of in tne the writ proposed harbours. They recommend that casemated | 13, Edw 's- plac 
Mr. Baron Rol mbers was toa l 
and valid; toned the rule obtai ong ens ory t must be | Dat'eries be ECR on the eames. cme ves, TARI 
i: E a T= brought up = the court bop = and Some these sho be supported by works and de- 
hen n to the writ could be argued au fences on t hes shore, flanking the approach to them and 
e Jan. 31.—(Hefore Mr. Serjeant Adams) ih the entrances of the harbours. At Dover and Seafor ie 
Farden v. lene Pratt, eee 
Chiswick against a certificate noch 
of London, de: this object. Thessluna of Portandp possesses ae at 
"The Act deciares that | 24vantages fo prays and = = fo naan of nips 
i Bcinace, Literature, | and Military dta any extent that m 
Pd 
eea 3 
pooch with whom ses Lë 
rh JANE: 
;—Direct to Mr. 
yas near Tourguays 
