45.] THE NEWSPAPER. 83 
ood that the pii 
i foe ‘positive 3 aia a o a songs s | Learned Ser, npt — essed e part of defendant, ) Somers, as well as thatof Lord Mansfield, showed that the petition 
aay was Son to Mr. Tho! hal "s discret cya commenting o absurdity a g ‘to aia a upon hunters as ne- | of right was not so restricted as the other side desired to represent. 
ag, r Mr. hildn etion, in | cessary to Larei ond at college, and jan songs gp the ee po on an p who had 
e any chilāren. The decree of | m mar to profligacy held out by the m of credit that p 
ál vai ou ersit "3 
+ ij Fas 
—This | kawai to th i rati 
| g e Jury, informed them as to the legal acceptation 
or Jair, at the sittin sabe | of the term “ m saries,” T fit 
£ f ecessaries,” and expressed a very ei dene algae Temedy to the he subje 
i apars ri ect, and w 
a» shrek bbe was found for reigna that the articles in question were not necessaries u the | would leave | him Vineet ae a coandy whe 
s bkra s obtained by | circumstances of the cise. The Jury, after senile: pee To restrict this remedy to cases where title to lan 
invari i s i i B 
wi 
4 > the onl; 
uestion arose was, that at the time of the | to law—that they might, o: ay, j s 
arria ates a certain close belonging | and fa es toe ag: zainst oe = and that Etha? doueent it. eau, and that his father m re 
Laces at defendant, the servant of his —Rea wei Thatcham Murder.— Robert Jennings was in- | Englishwoman, These things sche pee a "his eth he was 
p! i clothed with ights of a British-born subject. The Court took 
notice of a state war. If 
said close, usi n 
Defendant in his replication, had averred that the child w arsenic, an nd hai 
€ n e o a 
as in the said = tee there by the leave Polson on the poor Penide fo at Suom making h m believe it | notice that in 1777 "England was at peac 
g n ` sede, Ab theta era pb s salt. The prisoner, in his defen ied to throw ie charge | consequently that the Baron e bo! 
s n his niece, a young girl who had pe prid care of his chil- | English mother, and a father who was 
ren. The jury, however, returned a verdict of Guilty; and | He maintained that in an indictment tor treason, for being 
und with s h a the 
Di 
throw suspicion upon an innocent child, concluded by EER 
e of death in Spee usual form.—Ho ore Circurr—Hert- 
— W. Sheffield, ti mer, Was indicted for setting fire to abarn 
ana ‘other. farm- cpaiiises, in his own occupation: with intent to 
he! hers. It appeared that 
rough 
h 
: y d that at thi Baron, 
E u Lee Boswell, Ge r im e Warboys, rer ho was said to be a Fre: ject, j ian army, 
Frederick Jeans, were indicted for being un nlawfully, in the night f om he was a su 
urpose of poa! The Jury piriy a verdict of Guilty | denying that the property was unduly © níscated. 
against the two ae and acquitted Je: Jea ans. The prisoner Boswell, | was so, then the title of the on to compensation was fully 
who had, it appeared, been several din before i ison, ade out, and he onght to receive the jud ot of the courtin 
es, in which the 
z the C Court had come to the conclusion that the direc- 
. Baron Rolfe to the Jury, at the pe was correct, and 
set aside the verdict and for a new 
and against the form of the statute in suc ch c e and 
provided. There were other counts, va rying the pies 2 lay- 
ing the offence, and charging the defendant with receiving 
oney from the minister: these princes. Another count 
di y the ke 
and gon came into collision with aea te with the officers of 
T.— Richard Elliott and Richar A 
i @ | justice, human life was © often destroyed, and the expedition | charged ‘endant with rec the money under colour 
e t missi of niana The ib arned Judge then | of its be ft. The defendant had pleaded not guilty. 
ri; The Solicitor-General, in stating the case to the jury, said that 
the defendant was appointed resid Tanjore in November, 
1839, and continued till the early part of 1641. At that he 
went on sick leave to the Neilgh ills. Hew 
in offi . Bay} ntlemas, on g 
Tanjore, found m mours of what had taken place, aod 
co! icated the matter t mmment. Of course an 
It was ult of 
e 
ang the present information was the consequence. Several 
d read, ne one of which the defendant 
mitted the charge. Sir T. Wilde SS on behalf of the 
Crown, and several witnesses ager winged Bhp Kelly ad. 
peta the bela? Se for the defendan Lord I summed up, 
i ad g e ol and ars that if the jury believed nae ev rina yore verdict must 
T, Elliott, who was then taken into custody, his house be for the Crown. iets e jurors intimated their belief = the evi- 
ganna most part ofthe property found there. — was the di ounce the verdi 
o was tried some months since at Aa ford and ac- 
h a 
for the B tence. All he knew upon the aeea toi yong p 
wi wereall in e reike re — he was prepared to go o! 
with es prone ution. Sey defen: we an formally cate 
and as ng a bo 
Den m t es Sri Ry Kell 
eatemdant Taare to m a verdict for bim, in case 
hg mart shi safer think ig tg the objections taken in the course 
e trial by ri iie a ee able in ct = that the 
eiri was ni ort the infor 
upon her 
were PaE i i be estr cated. 
Court oF Qusen’s BENCH.—SITTING N BAN ate de 
Bode v. the Que en.—In our Paper of the vist ~ e gave the 
arguments inthis case as far as they had then gone, and stated 
S| aera: they were adjourned to Monday cape On that day Mr. 
elly concluded his argument, quoting a grea many ancient | thi ks = 
N iadh; CARLISLE.— pisht to show that no (sore pa of ght would lie, except for $ an and th 
which had been taken into the manual aea Orth p 
man- lands or chattels real, w! 
of the Crown, as the form of the judgment in all case remains are prima 
where the supplian: ant succeeded, was thst the Crown should rem oe both engaged as 
its hands from the occupation ye mang of sid ganai matter | report that 
i hold that of redre ey ble e 
inst the Crown for nidata p etag E pe for ebt | - h à 
A is the barito 
certained, would immediately open a door to such a vast v. apma 
of similar poera th ap pad ao apoE that the Co! Pg sige before | yoealist, wi 
they deliberately sanctioned such a ses e, 
would assure themselves that such a decisio cia accordance we have Brambilla. 
ith all the existing authorities upon the anand ct, E adding. | Among th 
ton followed upon the same side, and Perens! that Sito ark Madam 
petition of right at all to lie in res) t of such m, it could lie | gt Lisbon ; 
only for a British subject; that the toh int he a aban case | p + M A 
was not a ee eee ‘ithin the meaning of the conventions | DUTS 3, 
or the Act o ament upon this subject, regard being had to Botelli, of 
Baron euiar camer gf the birth and parentage of the | senson wi ar 
aron de e. Mr. Hill was heard for the m de e, ai! ? 
expressed his surprise that there should have been any attempt to Paris, who will appear for a limited Spia of no 
argue that the petition of right could not lie, except for land or The « orchestra will be on thesame seale as last = ep ig- 
ar gei r specific chat i He wasi eeg EATE pager 
on the authority contained in the spres Mansfield, in | will be the “ Ernani” of the new composer V 
Macbeath v. dinan t the petition of right lay for credits, 
and if these credits aeria wer? ae given to the Crown, then the = has created a tion on the cates a 
remedy could be thus enforced; ‘but St given to Parliament, then d Fornasari are to appear be before Easter, and as pane 
the Parliament must e isfy the e i a i the er vr Polo alls early this year, ape — portion “a e 
titr t be nonsuited, and the er to the whine ler the authority o! ar- 
to be of the same opinion ; m as | | t, to disburs: oe pues fund, and the Cipin h moat duly 4 will be of longer — a L BREET k * will, 
gnomes the task, tended that the authority of Lord | 3S US usual, be a great feature. Luc e Grahn, w agit 
on the case going to the Jury, the 
