192 
the Goverm a measures, and a 
give them m thle most cordial support. Leave was give 
x moved that the debate = the privilege 
ed to Monday n ould be 
s oy 
n M 
ary and Me eee "the 
fr. Meyer’s committal. —Mr. 
ssing the postponed artieles 
(butter a and cheese) of ‘the "arif, jerne nny to Mr. 
tated that no negotiation of any isa is 
n this country and Portugal. Tke House 
I and) Bill, and the rem: aining 
he 5 
and w wide-spreading distress had arisen in the west PEF 
py of Tretand from the simultaneous breaking of the banks 
in those districts some 20 or 30 years ago. It was, therefore, 
necessary to found the currency on the certain and immediate 
Suavertibility of its ad. = into gold. Even its joint-stock banks 
nt institutions—had not been ae i 
she Agricultural Bank, by the 
rable branches which it had established, and byt the, Sey 
sive wee of its paper, had. affected every lo n that 
intry, Th 
t nt, not to gua: 
aution, but against tthe pipiki ofothers, 
and from the a ne, eais oey a which all bank- 
i rto been involved. He then 
woul: 
vileges of the 
ing 
om other banks m 
tricted limits, 
out 
by abolis 
Pog, ne by, 
ing wi 
of it by assigning some portion of 
pe provision of a certain pee of spe 
Mr. E. observed, that though he was not going to 
throw a ny aniria in the way of this Bill going into com- 
mittee, he could not refrain from.stating his opinion that 
there was no necessity for the py pa EA oer apaan nt with 
ns Zanje and that Sir R. Peel had made e fi 
ist clause, Sir , Somes RVILLE moved an amen 
effect that the H: 
ent, 43; against it, 103 ; ; majority, 60. The 
h committee with some trifling amendments. 
hich ju pega ha oe been pro 
ied, includi 
t that a estii laws enhanced the price 
_ a therefore ere Pona bes at once 
who had laan mea nee agri- 
to be a man of very ws—had 
path! oe their's usual ae 
ie ande “gp hments. A very aent eA had told 
fim fist the gricuitural body would be well satisfied if he 
could draw fonts any og gr of ag Protection Soci ociety ry er- 
planation of what was the with the sour and why 
ae hen „proceeded to on 
nor the 
Those who were 
£ | loss which th 
sone on their supply of food. » 
THE NEWSPAPER. 
s to provide a further supply of food for the population | had evidently been endeav ouring one thing 4 
n one part of | 
d to 
ring bea stald to wait, and therefore they were obliged to inquire | his a and to ran Pw it in ty ext 
any | ment he had d bee s free-tr 
whether the improvements for which they were byte wait had a: 
chai 
foo 
at, ten, aa The reason that preclu 
Th 
hen materially 
ease of | price The fact 
diminished, owing to 
ce oF food high, you new 
Gre ritair 
was, that when you rendered the ‘prie 
two-thirds i oe pee popula 
ploym: scarcity wa ae 
Eea ought Te, when w 
upply of food for th 
ut for special reasons, and they KSA nothing z do with the 
present i gee wich ral i Šir J. Graham had told the 
ya e that there was a ualincrease of 580,000 ie in the 
population. of Great Britain e every ) year, and ha id nan ted that 
ome relaxation must be made in the Co ending epee ion 
to the aire increase of the population. Sir T Graham now 
said pe did not make that admission with that- view. 
Be it Then he (Mr. Villiers) would say, that it was 
not D annual increase in our population, bu the eno 
mous amount of destituti st 
—evinced by the 
s last year—whi re quired t 
e C He enaA that, ee 
n exporters, 
weren import their legislation ee o 
etant agriculture i R er vas every in Europe, and ther 
not a grai upon the Continent at present wi mith | 3 
nd, on behalf of the people, for fre 
the means ‘of Pibdetence. If Gov inent should either: sree 
the pre of local taxation, or the peculiar burdens on land, 
he w ald re only: “ Bring us in at oma an account ae T is paid 
on Se ose scores, and we ube ate it Has far ef than the 
e people sustai fos r, owin he restric- 
He giai ipon Gor ernment to 
ea the ge in pe ios 
making the foo 
reply to 
fully adie daring 
n modified i in 
standing the sneers 'h he had been ed for the e speech 
he had lately made, he ina again re that the prosperity 
of agriculture must depend on the prosperity of the other 
branches hed native ren and that r peara BAAS be 
mE ally promoted by giving rrupte: 
tinction of party, for the last 20 years, h: 
protecting for prohibitory duties, Analg to ane e gradually | Lar 
tecting duties where it had them to de: al wi He appro 
nj T 
of elusions practised on th ; bui 
he reminded oe woot ba Acme could be arg e dehision 
than to hold o the peo at they w run 
gain any considerable aay anlage? in t on 
the repeal of the Corn-laws. 
. Villi that un 
trade with open por rts would produce ab supply 
the labo: ourer, he hts make him a pas werk Le the pens 
£ free trade in corn. 
it age othe hes 
i a 
oe hie 
e more hi 
re more ope 1o 
the E HEA ra more 
-of the House, Sir James 
(June 14, 
In the 
pared 
ay Pe 
ae nave nd th 
DEN, proceeded to 
the } present S tat of Corn: casas yas not only inju 
community at large, but also to every porti 
Pp 
no more yg 2 00, wo guari ies K com n bon 
Europe was dra 
ward, not to “ay A failing p r 
at once, he believed tha at rents and mortgages would be t 
paid than they were at present, and that fresh — would 
take n into cultiv. ation, instead of old land being 
To that declaration ed replied, that for th 
period exactly protection to agricultur 
less and less. He also showed that the fluctuations 
h : 
ich 
e Anael troet to the expenses of the 
rried on to increase the 
t 
aias th 
bes ent in behalf 
abolishe ae ” he 
go into committee with him, and to c 
relaxation of the rg law should be m 
it as vicious in principle, 
nt co! 
impressio 
minds he a vEllow-c00n trymen, 
iS was only kept up 
. PEEL, after som 
t one pies d 
‘hat no o 
m to the fact. tradi ion to 
motion of Mr. first 
and) Bill was reada Tris) 
third reading easure. ‘His 
‘lose he bad | 
